|
For sure, now that it looks as if a lot of people just couldn't listen rather than didn't care.
About the Lou Gehrig thing: I think what was at issue is that Dan and Keith feel differently about Cal Ripken having broken Gehrig's consecutive game-appearance streak. Keith thinks that Ripken should deliberately NOT have tried to break it, but to have left it unbroken out of respect for Gehrig. He believes this for the simple reason that Gehrig didn't have any *choice* as to when to end his streak--the decision was made for him by the progress of his disease. Keith is terribly impressed (and I can't blame him) by the fact that for so many games before his streak stopped, Gehrig was playing as well as he was while he was, literally, dying. He had to quit playing when he became so ill he couldn't go on. Ripken was not facing any such handicap, and Keith believes that out of respect for the situation under which Gehrig's record ended, Ripken should have deliberately ended his streak short of Gehrig's and allowed it to stand. Dan disagrees with him, believing that Ripken should have kept it up as long as he wanted to regardless--you know, records are made to be broken, etc. I think Keith would have no problem agreeing with him on this if his quibble with it was strictly for sentiment's sake, but it's not--it's because we'll never really know how long Gehrig's streak might have been had he not become sick. Keith's sentimental in that sense, at least. He doesn't believe someone should break a sick man's record just to prove it can be done.
Their book goes into this issue. They disagree about Pete Rose too, which they also go into in their book--Dan thinks he belongs in the HOF, his sins are in the past, he should be forgiven because he was too great a player and they have artifacts of his career in Cooperstown anyway. Keith disagrees. He doesn't think any player who bet on baseball and was banned from the sport and has never even apologized should be in, ever--you should have to be a great PERSON, not just a great player. And he says they have a copy of his book written at age 14 in the HOF too, but that doesn't mean HE should be in!
|