Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

fun with my mormon relations

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Home & Family » Ancestry/Genealogy Group Donate to DU
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 04:11 PM
Original message
fun with my mormon relations
I recently made a couple of discoveries that were kinda cool. First, that I am related to Joseph Smith, founder of the Mormons. I am not sure if that is good or bad - if mormonism has been a positive force in the world or not.

But it definitely is a positive force for genealogy. :bounce:

Also, in the same branch, I finally found some distant relatives in my hometown. Ironically enough, one person that I found in that regard was one of my younger sister's first boyfriends. It would have been cool if I could have known that when they were dating. Of course, as 8th cousins it would not have been incestuous if they had married.

What I just found in the censuses struck me as so hilarious that I had to run right over here and share it. Looking at Don Carlos Smith in the 1910 census his 3rd son was listed, pretty clearly, as "Esses". I thought that just must be an odd name from the Book of Mormon or something. Then I checked the 1900 census, where he was listed as "Spencer S" :rofl:
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Cybergata Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-29-06 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Most people don't even know who is their 8th cousin.
There was a time that it was hard to marry a person who didn't have at least one shared ancestor, even if it was a GGG grandparent. If it is anything from 5th or 6th cousin on, I don't think it would be consider incestuous, at least according to the Catholic church.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-02-06 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Actually...
at least in the context of the Catholic Church, marriages within the fourth degree of consanguinity (third cousins and closer) required an episcopal dispensation; those outside this degree of relationship didn't--my great-grandmother's sister married her third cousin once removed (related in the fifth degree) without a dispensation. (Not sure whether this has changed since Vatican II.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-04-06 04:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I have misplaced my chart
but one of the problems with that is the multiple connections. I have an ancestral couple which has 3 connections 3.1,3.1, and 4.1. If you add those up their connection to each other is closer than 2nd cousin once removed. Another problem might be that people are so dispersed that they have very little idea who their 3rd cousins are. I just talked to a 3rd cousin today who seemed unaware of her great grandfather's name even though her mother was still alive and even though she has a first cousin who is named after him. That's not unusual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-04-06 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yes, but there aren't always those multiple connections...
and anyway Protestants (and probably Mormons) don't have the same rules on consanguinous marriages that Catholics do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. I recently found out my parents were 10th cousins.......lol!
With my dad's side Mormon, and a great genealogy researcher on my mom's side, it still took me putting things together to figure it out............

Those 18th century New England roots are tangled like spaghetti.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Cybergata Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I expect most people are atleast their own 11th cousin!
Anyway, 10th cousins isn't a big deal at all. I'm my own 5th and 6th cousin. Those #%$ Luceros. Most of my Hispanic ancestors followed by church law to be at least 5 times removed to get married. Of course, if you afford to do penance and deliver a few hundred adobe bricks to the local church, you could get away with marrying your 2nd cousin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Home & Family » Ancestry/Genealogy Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC