Guardian Article

[NashVegas]

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/jul/01/hillaryclinton.uselections2008

[cornermouse]

1. The article is right.

And the democratic party has lost something in the process. It's heart, maybe?

[DemExpat]

2. I agree.

For me, it has "forever" changed.

Bookmarking this article.

DemEx

[Maribelle]

3. 1257 times in one year

Using the Advanced Search dashboard, the term "Billary" returned 1257 topics for the past year here on DU.


From part two: How a bitter primary campaign saw the right's discredited smears gleefully revived and reused by the left

It was an indication of how thoroughly the left co-opted the use of the GOP and media-created scandals, to smear Hillary Clinton during the presidential primaries, that the Republicans weren't even mentioning them much anymore, content to let the Left do its dirty work. There was little reason for GOP operatives to get their hands dirty reviving the villainous First Lady Macbeth caricature, when many liberals were happy to do it for them.

Not content to merely destroy the entire Democratic party single-handedly, Hillary Clinton was hell-bent on murder. Evidently having failed to satiate her bloodlust after murdering Vince Foster - or such was the claim of her ideological enemies, a charge still being chanted like a demonic incantation by rightwing pain-maker Rush Limbaugh - now she was openly lusting for the assassination of her opponent, Barack Obama. (That is not to suggest there were no legitimate concerns about her statement.) And Randi Rhodes - a "progressive talk radio personality" - fresh from calling Clinton a "fucking whore," fanned the same flames when she announced fearing for her life after delivering the insult to someone who routinely has her enemies whacked.

"Billary", the two-headed monster created by the rightwing to demonize the "two-for-one" presidency of Bill Clinton and his feminist, advisor wife Hillary Clinton, also stumbled out of its grave, given new life by liberals who defended the Clintons against the very same attack when it was her being used against him during his administration, but now found it politically expedient to use him against her. Billary was back in vogue, and infamous Clinton-haters in the media like Maureen Dowd or Chris Matthews (who remains as fixated on Clinton scandals, especially the Lewinsky matter - the scandal that made his career - as ever) accused Hillary of being nothing without her husband, only having come within inches of the presidency because her husband had cheated on her. The progressive blogosphere largely remained silent, or, worse, acquiesced by suggesting there was some truth to the categorisation.


more ...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/jul/02/hillaryclinton.uselections2008

[Beacool]

4. They have been trying to destroy Hillary and Bill since 1992.

They haven't succeeded yet and they never will.