Kos is a klown - or why did Obama Girl darken Obama?

[robbedvoter]

http://cannonfire.blogspot.com/2008/03/kos-is-klown-or-why-did-obama-girl.html

When the Hillary ad was placed online, everything in it was broadened -- including the image of Obama, including the image of Hillary. Everything. If the Obama imagery derived from an online source, it could have been broadened twice.

And that's that. We here encounter no racism -- just an imperfect technology, misunderstood by Luddite lunkheads with a phobia for research. (Frankly, I strongly doubt that darkening Obama's face would ever affect a single vote.)

Did Markos seek technical expertise when he made his grand pronouncements? No, he did not. One of his commenters testifies that the image manipulation must have been intentional -- but this remark comes from a copy editor at an ad house.


Markos Moulitsas, you stand exposed as a fool."



my note: except that this fool placed his poison in the echo chamber - it's vrwc tool now! Think Dan Rather and the forged documents..

[rodeodance]

1. This was posted out there a few days ago--not well recieved by many

[paulk]

2. Markos is an idiot

That's all that needs to be said. Why this moron is seen, by the MSM even, as some kind of spokesman for the left is a travesty.

His most recent Kos article where he "debunks" Hillary's "big states" strategy reads like it was written by someone with the reasoning ability of a 10 year old. Or maybe someone on the payroll of the Obama campaign. Why not? He was getting paid by Dean to use his website to promote Howard and kept that a secret. That tells you all you need to know about the guy, IMO.

[libbygurl]

3. Not surprising. Why, indeed, he's considered a mouthpiece for the left boggles my mind.

nt