Are YOU on the list?

[SaveOurDemocracy]

:shrug:

What a pathetic bunch:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=5106185&mesg_id=5106248

[BlackVelvet04]

1. I certainly hope so.....

otherwise all of my efforts to piss off Obama supporters will have been wasted ;-)

[UALRBSofL]

3. BlackVelvet do you know what happened to LiberalNurse??

She hasn't been around in a while. Was she T.S. and if so, do you know why?

[BlackVelvet04]

5. No, I'm sorry, I don't know what happened.....

I hope she wasn't Tombstoned.

[zabet]

6. She was tombstoned.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=user_profiles&u_id=117274

I think for this...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=4847428&mesg_id=4848269

or at least for comments in the thread. I have
seen far worse from Ozombies that is allowed to
stand. x(

[UALRBSofL]

7. Thanks for posting this

I have seen far worse from Obamamaniacs myself. What hypocrisy.

[Name removed]

9. Deleted sub-thread

Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[BlackVelvet04]

8. thanks for the info....

that's a shame.

[zabet]

10. A Damn shame.

The Obabies can dish out all
the shit they want but, if a
Hillary supporter does it, they
all call for a ban.

:puke:

[rodeodance]

14. The horrible thing is that Thread was allow to

stay!!

[zabet]

16. 99% of what I alert on

stays. :grr:

[SaveOurDemocracy]

19. I have the poster of that thread on ignore ... so, I can't

see the topic ... but, I can imagine it was obnoxious.

It's very obvious that there are 2 sets of standards being applied on this board. Every day, many vile threads, and statements, are allowed to stand about HRC ... and her supporters.

[zabet]

2. Surely I am.

If I am not, then I have not
been trying hard enough. ;)

[UALRBSofL]

4. He He

Maybe I should try harder.

[Maribelle]

11. I've often been told I am on ignore - -

I only hope I made the list too. :grouphug:

[Jamastiene]

12. I'm sure I'm on the list too, but that just cuts down

on some of assy Obama supporters responding to anything I say with some assy responses. It's better for me in lots of ways. I'm in no mood for them right now anyhow.

[Hatchling]

13. Omg! They need a list?

Can't they decide on an individual basis who pisses them off? They need a crib sheet telling them who is a Hillary supporter? Or are they afraid that those among us who are strong in the Force will sway the weak minded among the kool-aid drinkers? Sheesh.

[NastyRiffraff]

15. I know, that was my first thought, too

They actually have to be TOLD who to ignore? That is beyond pathetic.

I have no idea whether or not I'm on the list, nor do I care. I don't make a habit of starting negative threads, although I do respond with snark at times. So if I'm on the "Ignore Crib Sheets" I'll just laugh.

[robbedvoter]

20. My thought exacactly! groupthink at its best!

[qnr]

17. Don't know, don't care. Unifying Americans by putting dissenters on a blacklist, nice. Senator

Joe McCarthy would be one of their enthusiastic backers, I'd guess.

[judaspriestess]

18. I am sure I am on the list

I could be considered a drive by poster because I very rarely engage in a stupid pointless argument with those freaks so I most certainly hope I am!!!

Yay!

[Control-Z]

21. Where can we view the list?

I would be so honored to find my name!!...but I'm afraid I've probably been far too polite to be acknowledged.lol

[Clinton Crusader]

22. LiberalNurse was TS'ed??????

When did this happen? OMG, Im gonna miss her! That really sucks!

[jackson_dem]

23. More proof much of his hardcore support is cultish

I am not surprised. I suspected they did mass alerts and other things through e-mail. Remember the campaign they had against P2BA? They were able to gun him down and force, through their whining, a rule change because of it.

[Tellurian]

24. I'm sure to be at the top of the list..

They hate me more than words can say. I felt the baiting was dead on today and someone was going to get it. What I am not understanding is the Adm never behaved this way where Tomb stoning was an everyday event. TS was reserved for new posters who arrive on the scene and start right in with the insults and derogatory remarks. They stuck out like sore thumbs because they never added anything in any way to a constructive discussion. Warnings and Suspensions was the usual ticket if anyone was way out of line and posting repeated over the top comments.

Has Skinner sold this site to the Obama Campaign? Or maybe leased it to them for the duration of the Primary? Where they hold great sway over Hillary supporters who are posting articles revealing the underbelly of the hidden side of Obama?

Jeebus, we're talking about who will be the next POTUS for God sakes. If a candidate can't survive on his own, is he worthy for the highest seat in the land having censorship as his crutch for making monumental decisions over life and death? And if we're all not in agreement with him (them) we should be bannished from the land?

I really don't know what to think anymore and I don't know what Skinner can possibly be thinking allowing the heavy gloves of the Obama supporters 5 to 1 falling on Hillary supporters where if Hill supporters defend themselves, they are tomb stoned and banned from the forum.

Any input would be appreciated.