"Generation Obama? Perhaps Not. "

[zabet]

This is an interesting op-ed by
by William Kristol that was in the
New York Times.

Yeah, I know he is pretty much a
right winger but, sometimes they offer
a more un-biased point of view.

He touches on the Affleck event and
then this, and all the Obama supporters
think this issue will die gracefully...

But Ronald Kessler, a journalist who has written about Wright’s ministry, claims that Obama was in fact in the pews at Trinity last July 22. That’s when Wright blamed the “arrogance” of the “United States of White America” for much of the world’s suffering, especially the oppression of blacks. In any case, given the apparent frequency of such statements in Wright’s preaching and their centrality to his worldview, the pretense that over all these years Obama had no idea that Wright was saying such things is hard to sustain.

This doesn’t mean that Obama agrees with Wright’s thoroughgoing and conspiracy-heavy anti-Americanism. Rather, Obama seems to have seen, early in his career, the utility of joining a prominent church that would help him establish political roots in the community in which he lives. Now he sees the utility of distancing himself from that church. Obama’s behavior in dealing with Wright is consistent with that of a politician who often voted “present” in the Illinois State Legislature for the sake of his future political viability.

The more you learn about him, the more Obama seems to be a conventionally opportunistic politician, impressively smart and disciplined, who has put together a good political career and a terrific presidential campaign. But there’s not much audacity of hope there. There’s the calculation of ambition, and the construction of artifice, mixed in with a dash of deceit — all covered over with the great conceit that this campaign, and this candidate, are different.

He then bounces back to the Generation Obama
issue...and from this quote, it almost sounds
like an O-harmony dating site...

Which brings us back to the “Generation Obama” event. If you go to the Obama campaign Web site and click on “people,” you’ll see 14 categories of people you can choose to hook up with — women, labor, people of faith ... and “Generation Obama.”

He then sums it up nicely with this....

Now I’m actually a believer in the next generation, which one might call the 9/11 generation. Many of its members seem more serious and impressive than we baby boomers were when our elders were foolishly praising us, 40 years ago, as the best-educated, most idealistic generation ever. Many of the best of this young generation are serving their country — either in the military or otherwise. Some are in politics, working for various causes, liberal and conservative, and for various candidates, Democrats and Republicans. But surely there’s something creepy about a campaign claiming them as “Generation Obama.”

With no particular dog in the Democratic fight, many conservatives have tended to think it would be good for the country if Obama were to win the Democratic nomination, freeing us from the dreary prospect of the return of the House of Clinton. Now I wonder. Might the country be better off with the cynicism of the Clintons than the conceit of Obama?

There is more to the article than the snippets
presented here. More coverage of the Affleck
event.
LINK: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/17/opinion/17kristol.html?em&ex=1205985600&en=de9d6b3b3cf39e55&ei=5087

[Control-Z]

1. Kick

if only for the reference to “Generation Obama”. Is he, like, 18-29 years old now?? - and with a mansion, a wife, and two kids, no less? Wow, well, there is something to be impressed with after all.

[vireo]

2. I guess that makes most of us "Generation Hillary"

I never expected Kristol to be right about anything, but that first excerpt is spot on.