|
I tend to be too impulsive in some communications with people, e-mail is a terrible offender. I've gotten in trouble with that - firing back an e-mail too easily without thinking of how it will be received. it's worse than telephone, or writing. In person one can read the other, and on the phone some as well. In an e-mail one can misconstrue things, fly off the handle, etc. far too easily (at least I should say I can)
But in all areas of my life the traditions could be helpful I suppose. The self supporting through our own contributions is an interesting one to think about in it's different incarnations. At work, I am self supporting, and my contribution is to work. I don't get paid for getting on the internet, or playing, or anything else that I've done all too often.
In relationships, contribution means giving and taking in a free flowing way I'd think. If I'm in a relationship it has to be a partnership and there have to be agreed upon terms. If those terms are infringed upon and you try to address it repeatedly to no avail, it's not like the 12 step group. Or is it? I mean what does it take to start a new meeting? A resentment and a coffee pot. Certainly that is one way that groups have spread. Back to relationships. When two people have come to a point at which they can't seem to resolve their differences, and it's to the point of involving others, and there is no longer any impetus to feel that even if their differences were resolved that it would make a difference. At the point of indifference. Where do the traditions fit in there?
|