Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

'Shortcuts' Of The Mind Lead To Miscalculations Of Weight And Caloric Intake, Study Finds

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Health & Disability » Weight Loss/Maintenance Group Donate to DU
 
steven johnson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 03:53 PM
Original message
'Shortcuts' Of The Mind Lead To Miscalculations Of Weight And Caloric Intake, Study Finds
Apparently, we are geneticallly programmed to ignore the increased caloric content of food as the portion size increases. This cognitive distortion makes it very difficult to keep from overeating since the caloric content is not obvious. In other words, at least some of us are genetically preprogrammed to overeat. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/10/081003122705.htm

And overweight people don't have respond to satiety cues telling them they've had enough.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080109112302.htm

In my case I'm just big boned.


ScienceDaily (June 16, 2009) — Psychologists at the University of Pennsylvania have identified a cognitive shortcut, or heuristic, they call "Unit Bias," which causes people to ignore vital, obvious information in their decision-making process, points to a fundamental flaw in the modern, evolved mind and may also play a role in the American population's 30 years of weight gain.

When estimating calories, study participants assumed portion sizes were culturally typical and guessed no caloric differences between small and large portions.

"We have heuristics in our brain — simple mechanistic shortcuts that have evolved over hundreds of thousands of years, which free up precious space in our consciousness," said Andrew Geier, lead author in the Department of Psychology in Penn's School of Arts and Sciences. "In these atypical instances, however, it's the shortcut that hurts us."

"We have evolved in a very different environment," Geier said. "It used to be that food was scarce, and you ate what was available because you didn't know where your next meal would come from. That is not the case anymore.

Text

Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Catshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yep...
this is also discussed in Kessler's book. Sorry to harp on it, but it totally opened my eyes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-17-09 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. All the more reason to
1) Eat off the salad or desert plate as your main plate, rather than the typical dinner plate.

2) Carefully control portions. Use a food scale if you have to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Catshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Excellent advice.
I can't tell you how much this has helped me. I used to think that fruit was "free" so I'd eat what I wanted figuring hey, it isn't ice cream or chips. Of course not, but fruit does have carbs. And I do use a food scale to help resize portions in my head. Overtime my sense of normal size portion got skewed.

I don't eat out much these days -- both to save money and to control what I'm eating. When I do, I'll ask for the doggie bag/box to be delivered before or when the meal arrives so I can immediately box up half of it. If it isn't on the plate, I won't eat it.

Another thing I do before I go out is visit the restaurant's website. If they have nutritional information, I use that to figure out what is "safe" to eat. I met some friends at Einstein's last week and did this. I thought the Chipotle Turkey Wrap would be safe. Not with 37 fat grams and 800+ calories!!! Holy Moly! I opted for the Ancho Chicken thing that was less than 400 calories. It was on the store's menu but not the website and I don't know how many fat grams it had but at least the calorie count was down.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Oh yeah,
totally agree with you about being able to look at the menu ahead of time. I really appreciate restaurants who put their food info on line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
steven johnson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 03:23 AM
Response to Original message
3. Here's the missing URL from the story
www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/06/090615153116.htm -
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Jan 05th 2025, 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Health & Disability » Weight Loss/Maintenance Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC