|
Sorry for the long delay, I just noticed your reply. I totally agree with the sentiment in your last sentence (all of it really but the last sentence is particularly interesting to me).
The reason I posted earlier was not really my frustration with interviewing, or job hunting, but my frustration about people who are promoted to lofty positions lofty enough to presume to judge others, when in fact they themselves probably are lacking talent.
There is a paradigm shift going on now, where technology companies are judged based on the number of programmers they attract. Right now RIM is being criticized for not attracting enough developers for their phone. People who make progress happen (programmers) are in control.
Ok, I'm going to act arrogant as hell here, and state that I am tired of employers who know nothing about technological development, ie "progress", behaving as though they are lofty. And that goes for 'pretenders' too, people who pretend to be talented at technology, but who are really in it just for the money, and hire others to do all the actual work. Interestingly, I also am anti-arrogant too which creates a conundrum for me.
I would love to work with more skilled people, who are comfortable enough with their talent that they can hire someone, mentor them, and not feel threatened. Unfortunately in most cases, people are uncomfortable hiring someone who is more skilled than they are. And they never ever want to teach anyone anything because then they would be frightened of becoming obsolete themselves (or it just ends up that way). I have often taught others my knowledge, no fear of repercussions, and it has never resulted in less job security for me.
But unfortunately when people are talented, the nontalented either feel threatened or want to make them pawns in office politics, with regard to who gets to control us. Most people are not really in it for the benefit of the company but for themselves only. I hope this changes.
|