Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do Federal Judges get paid enough??? Some don't think so.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
misternormal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 12:53 PM
Original message
Do Federal Judges get paid enough??? Some don't think so.
Edited on Sun Apr-23-06 12:55 PM by misternormal
This should piss everybody off !!!

Oh, the Indignities of a Judge's Paycheck

A job for life, generous bennies, the pick of tee times, and compliments from every lawyer in town can't make up for the reality of "low" pay on the federal bench. Making between $149,132 and $208,100 (on par with the vice president and House speaker) just doesn't cut it anymore for the black-robed class. Listen to Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy. "We are patronized when we meet judges from England, the European Union, or Malaysia, whose salaries double that of ours," he tells a House subcommittee. "They say, 'We're so sorry about your salaries.' You shouldn't put us in that position."

His dramatic complaints reveal that judicial pay has gone from a whine to a serious issue that Chief Justice John Roberts plans to raise with Congress. "The failure of the Congress to address the problem of judicial salary is assuming the proportion of a historic wrong," says Kennedy. Court reps say law school students shun the bench, judicial morale is low, and many are fleeing to wealthy firms. Kennedy says his law clerks win signing bonuses equal to his $199,200 salary when they leave, and the federal bench's top class-action judge quit because he didn't get a cost-of-living adjustment. The resulting higher workload even has older judges off the links and in the court full time. "They don't have to do that," says Kennedy. "They don't have to work at all."

http://www.usnews.com/usnews/politics/whispers/articles/060417/17whisplead.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well, I haven't seen anyone having to twist arms to get
nominees to want the job, have you? There always seem to be lots of candidates when there's a vacancy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. actually both Clinton and Bush
have had problems recruiting people to the bench. Unless a person has already made a ton of money the amounts paid to federal judges is peanuts. A graduate fresh from an ivy league law school in good years can make more money than a federal judge. That is crazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Of course that rookie can make the big bucks, but I don't think
you can put a price tag on a public service position. Where would it stop...or start for that matter?

What is a President really worth? Should Clinton have been paid several million but Shrub should get minumum wage?

What about Congressmen? Most of them are attorneys too!

It's well known that private practice law pays a LOT more than being a public defender, but there are many attorneys who choose the PD route because THAT'S what they want to do!

I spent a lot of time working with two of the partners in a very prominent Washington DC law firm who were working on a legal situation for the Co. I worked for at the time. Both billed out at $700/hr! They were very good at what they did, but most of their benefits to our Co. was who they knew, not necessarily what they knew.

I don't think you can compare a Gov't job with private industry ones. The taxpayers can't afford to pay what private industry does, and in Gov't, the good get the same pay right alongside the bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I am not advocating a 1 for 1 match
but we should do better than what a major law firm pays its first year associates. I would think something around 500k would work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
951-Riverside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Where do I apply? :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. don't increase the pay or Reagan-Bush appointees will never leave
Edited on Sun Apr-23-06 01:10 PM by Neil Lisst
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poppyseedman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm going to disagree here.
SCOTUS and Federal judges should be well compensated.

$149,132 to $208,100 may seem like a lot of money to an average joe like you or me, but in the legal profession, it's peanuts. It's actually disrespectful.

These people are supposed to be the "BEST" our country has to offer. They should be paid compensatory to these position.

How much pay should they get? I don't know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. THESE PEOPLE are 80% pubs the past 25 years!!
They may be able to make a lot more money, but they are Republican hacks, so don't worry about their wallets.

Lower pay means some retire early to go back to private practice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poppyseedman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I don't know the political affiliations was a know fact for
sitting SCOTUS judges ???

Ask any rethug and they will tell you 60% judges are liberals hacks? Souter being top on their list
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. they would be wrong
Republican presidents appoint Republican judges, and when they control one or both houses of congress, that means more courts and more judges while they are in power.

Only 3 of the 9 SC justices were appointed by Dems - Stevens, Ginsberg, and Brier. Souter was appointed by Bush I.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poppyseedman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. and..............Souter votes with the liberals almost all the time.
O'Conner was appointed by Reagan. She was not a solid rethug vote by any means.

You are making my point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. O'Connor voted with the right most of the time.
Edited on Sun Apr-23-06 05:48 PM by Neil Lisst
Freepers think O'Connor voted with liberals, and that's only because she didn't vote with them on about 20% of the votes the neoconmen find important. They're such morons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. Kennedy wants his cut
for his swing vote in 2000. He flopped like a fish before landing in Bush's pocket. He was also the idiot who agreed to hear the case in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. Cost effective solution: don't publish judge salary info
Listen to Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy. "We are patronized when we meet judges from England, the European Union, or Malaysia, whose salaries double that of ours," he tells a House subcommittee. "They say, 'We're so sorry about your salaries.' You shouldn't put us in that position."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC