the world has known, and both were involved at the Nuremburg Tribunal, I thought the opinion of one the historical phenomenon's greater chroniclers would have bearing on any consideration of comparisons with present day political movements.
I've read Dr. Gilbert's work, along with a sizeable selection of other Tribunal-related material, including Dr. Arendt's analysis of Eichmann's trial in Jerusalem (
The Banality of Evil) and the works of Bradley Smith. My suggestion to you is that the topic
may prove weightier than Dr. Gilbert's psychological assessment of defeated prisoners, and that the formation of a totalitarian movement -- to say nothing of a totalitarian regime itself -- and the concomitant societal descent into the madness of comparable crimes against humanity may prove more difficult than so many on this board imagine.
You, on the other hand, have chosen to preemptively encourage me to read another book, this a journalist's opinion (M. Mayer, which also I have read), before even granting me the courtesy of a reply to your original query, while I have encouraged you to read one of the 20th century's foremost political theorists, an intellectual of considerable academic renown, and a staunch opponent from within the Reich dating to its earliest days.
(Few of Dr Arendt's works are available on the web, as the executors of her academic legacy are loath to release for free what is still in considerable demand at universities worldwide. You can find selections from the three volumes of The Origins of Totalitarianism
here (http://nickcooper.com/origins.htm), though these are admittedly inadequate, and in the main unfortunately miss many of Dr. Arendt's most salient points, particularly in regards the central role of organization in the development of a totalitarian regime, the complexities of the relationship of the police to the state, and the role isolation and loneliness play in the triumph of ideology and terror over the human spirit. Should you read all of Dr Arendt's three-volume work, you'll readily see the dissimilarities between Hitlerian Germany and George W's America.
Oh, and read Evan S. Connell's Points for a Compass Rose.
Because it's extraordinary and important and not because we're just throwing book names into the ether. Read it, too, because Connell illustrates the need to understand Simon Dubnow's final admonition if you ever hope to appreciate the horror of the Third Reich, or expect to survive the Bushbaby's America. (Google Dubnow. You'll see.))