Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FOUR STATES (VT, RI, IL, CA) plus FITZGERALD = BUSH IMPEACHMENT

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 01:50 PM
Original message
FOUR STATES (VT, RI, IL, CA) plus FITZGERALD = BUSH IMPEACHMENT
Edited on Mon Apr-24-06 01:50 PM by berni_mccoy
There are now FOUR (that's FOUR) States that have legislature initiatives ON THE TABLE or under consideration for the impeachment of Bush.

For those who don't know, one of the ways Impeachment can be initiated is if a state legislature issues CHARGES OF IMPEACHMENT to the U.S. House of Representatives.

From http://impeachpac.org/?q=node/716 :
In the House there are various methods of setting an impeachment in motion: by charges made on the floor on the responsibility of a Member or Delegate; . . . by a resolution dropped in the hopper by a Member and referred to a committee; by a message from the President; by charges transmitted from the legislature of a State or territory or from a grand jury.


One thing I learned is that A GRAND JURY can trigger an impeachment. A grand jury simply needs to INDICT him and impeachment hearings begin. Hmmmm... let me think for a moment, who's investigating crimes of the White House right now.... OH YEAH, Patrick Fitzgerald!!!

And wouldn't you know it, Bush has been IMPLICATED AS AUTHORIZING THE ILLEGAL DECLASSIFICATION OF CIA INFORMATION.

Fitzgerald could simply ask the Grand Jury to Indict Bush, and WHAMO, IMPEACHMENT.

I think the only question is now, how many state legislatures will follow suit? Oh, and THEY DON'T NEED APPROVAL FROM THEIR RESPECTIVE STATE GOVERNORS!!!! Bwahahahahah!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yipee! keep 'em comin'!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. PRESIDENT PELOSI 2007!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. Those are great states; they should unite and invite others to do the same
They can call it the united states or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Hehe, and the flag can start over with FOUR STARS
You want to be part of the U.S., you need to Impeach Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. we have to stop this idiot
NOW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. What about Nebraska?
they only have ONE house so it necessarily would be easier than the ones with two.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
huskerlaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
24. hahahahaha
surely you kid. Impeaching Bush won't be easy in Nebraska. He's still got a 52% approval rating there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justice1 Donating Member (483 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #24
37. We need to bi-pass the media, to reach the voters.
Have you ever heard a story about ES&S that isn't glowing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. didn't Wisconsin vote to impeach and withdraw from Iraq too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. That was the Wisconsin Democratic Party
I don't think the state legislature took up actual charges... not certain though... If they did, then that makes FIVE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. It was the Dem party, Not the legislature unfortunately n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frustratedlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. I forget. Has this ever happened before?
I'd rather see Fitzgerald indict him and save all the time and money of going through another grand jury. Get the job done and get * the he** out of the White House ASAP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
9. The Salt Lake County Dem Convention was last Saturday - that was
a resolution offered up there - a big group got up and booed and said no to impeachment and then promptly walked out after that vote was over - I'm fairly certain they were Republican plants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
11. More good news, berni! Check this out...
http://www.impeachbush.tv/impeach/bystate.html

California Grassroots effort is building. SF, Santa Cruz, San Diego, Arcata passed resolutions. Planning impeachment forum at Democratic Convention 4/28-29.

Colorado Nederland, CO to consider impeachment on April 11th.

Illinois Karen Yarbrough (D-Maywood) introduces HJR0125 in the state Assembly.

Indiana Lake Station to consider impeachment on April 13th.

New Mexico State Democratic party adds impeachment to platform.

New York Plattsburgh endorses HRes635 for investigation and possible impeachment.

Massachusetts Nick Casey is submitting an impeachment resolution as a "citizen petition".

Maine Kennebec County Democratic Committee passed April 20, 2006.

North Carolina Meeting planned for April 27th at Durham Main Library

Rhode Island US Senate candidate Carl Sheeler calls for state impeachment.

Washington 34th District Democrats of West Seattle agreed to a resolution.

Wisconsin 2005 Democratic Party Convention passed a resolution.

Vermont Several cities and counties passed. State Democratic convention also passes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pat_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Re: "Rhode Island US Senate candidate Carl Sheeler calls for state. . . "
DU Challenge to keep his "Be Patriotic! Impeach" Bush billboard up another month!!

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=364&topic_id=1011338&mesg_id=1011338

Can you help?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CarlSheeler4U Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #17
39. Yeah. go. Pat, go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greiner3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. Where's Ohio, where's Ohio?
Oh yeah, I forgot. They are the ones repealing the Constitution!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuCifer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
26. Of COURSE FloriDUH is freakin NO WHERE on these lists...
...god this state really has gone to CRAP thanks to Jebthro BU$Hitler...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marions ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
31. YES!
Edited on Tue Apr-25-06 04:41 PM by marions ghost
OK maybe there is no precedent for this ever before.

But there was no precedent for the Supreme Court Selection of the p/Rresident either...

We need to contact state legislators now >>>>>>>>>>>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CarlSheeler4U Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #11
40. And still pushing, too. Keep the billboard going, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vogonity Donating Member (283 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
12. *Can* he be indicted ?
One thing I learned is that A GRAND JURY can trigger an impeachment. A grand jury simply needs to INDICT him and impeachment hearings begin. Hmmmm... let me think for a moment, who's investigating crimes of the White House right now.... OH YEAH, Patrick Fitzgerald!!!

As I recall from Watergate and the Clinton Impeachment Travesty, a sitting president cannot be indicted. IANAL, but can anyone clarify?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DelawareValleyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Here's a good link
Most legal scholarship seems to indicate that a sitting President CAN'T be indicted. The ultimate arbiter would be the Supreme Court, if any enterprising grand jury ever indicted a President

http://www.justice.gov/olc/sitting_president.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. He *can* be indicted, but not TRIED... The procedure would be:
Indictment by a grand jury
Impeachment
If Senate Convicts, then Bush would face Trial (for crimes the grand jury indicted him for)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. As I read the constitution he can be indicted, tried and convicted, but...
He's still the President until he's impeached and convicted in the Senate.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Roy Donating Member (283 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #12
28. The Watergate prosecutor named Nixon as an "un-indicted co-conspirator"
Jaworski's team felt that actually Nixon COULD be indicted and tried, but that the law wasn't settled on that point and if they tried to do it, Nixon's lawyers would make dozens of objections at every step of the procedings, and would appeal every ruling they didn't like all the way to the Supreme Court, with the result that the trial would stretch out for years.

They decided as a practical matter that it would be better to name Nixon as an "un-indicted co-conspirator" (ie, "we could have indicted him, but we decided not to") and let the political process (ie, impeachment) take its course.

Of course, back then there WAS a political process, and it WAS taking its course. Our situation today is quite different, unfortunately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PublicWrath Donating Member (597 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
16. Does anyone have any estimate how long it will be
before these initiatives are actually debated, (assuming that at least one or two have already been approved for formal debate)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
18. NOTE: COMMITTEE IS NOT REQUIRED IN THIS CASE
See here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=364&topic_id=1011916&mesg_id=1013010

The bottom line, a State Legislature or Grand Jury CAN BEGIN IMPEACHMENT... it does not go through committee review.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. That's the GOOD news.
Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #18
34. in theory, committee isn't necessary , but can't be avoided
Even if the impeachment process is initiated by a resolution from a state legislature, until the Democrats gain a majority in the House, the end result is going to be the same: referral to committee, followed by its disappearance.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=2586988&mesg_id=2589510

onenote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #18
35. self-delete -- dupe
Edited on Tue Apr-25-06 04:51 PM by onenote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KAT119 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
20. K&R! K&R! K&R!K&R! K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
23. Which state will be the first?
I'm taking bets.

I'd say the winner should get an all expense paid trip to DC to be our very own DU witness to the impeachment.

Which state will make history?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IthinkThereforeIAM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
25. K&R...

...eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
27. Serious question about timing. i.e. trying not to get my hopes up
I am all for impeachment. The administration is criminal (and evil in my opinion) and must be stopped. My only concern is the Republican majority in the House and Senate. How soon can these resolutions realistically be passed? Would they open the issue in the 109th Congress or when the 110th takes office in January 2007?

Can double jeopardy apply if the 109th Congress gets forced to address the issue, a trial ensues and the administration is found not guilty?

My realist side says there is not nearly eough time to accomplish the investigation and trial prior to January 2007, but the pessimistic side of me can see the damned Republicans who see the writing on the wall rushing it through while they still have a modicum of control.

And DAMN am I nervous about the election in November. Not because I think the Democrats would lose but because I fear Diebold would "win."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pat_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
29. And speaking of Rhode Island. . .
Edited on Mon Apr-24-06 09:07 PM by pat_k

Check out the DU Challenge to keep the
"Be Patriotic! Impeach Bush" billboard up
(Sheeler for U.S. Senate)

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=364&topic_id=1011338&mesg_id=1011338

Related:

The Third Man (Providence Journal editorial 23-Apr)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheUnspeakable Donating Member (960 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
30. Kick this baby!!!!!!!
here's a direct link to sign up and help this effort along!!
Join The Impeachment Working Group!
<http://www.pdamerica.org/impeach-wg.php>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
32. Kick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freedom_Aflaim Donating Member (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
33. How Many States before COngress is required to try
and hopefully convict?

We need to get this jammed through!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Independent_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
36. These four states kick ass!
Fitz kicks ass too!

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DanCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
38.  Chimpys going get impeached someday uh-huh uh-huh
Edited on Wed Apr-26-06 12:07 AM by DanCa
Oh Chimpy's going to get impeached someday uh-huh uh-huh
With Rummy and Cheney by his side chimpy is going to get impeached someday uh-huh uh-huh

Sorry I am listening to Bruce Springsteen singing Froggy Went a Courtin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC