Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How much would gas be if oil was at $30 per barrel?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 11:23 AM
Original message
How much would gas be if oil was at $30 per barrel?
Someone told me that for the Alberta oil sands to be viable the price per barrel of oil would have to be $30 per barrel. I am also told that there are vast amounts of oil there.

Why not just make a treaty with Canada and Mexico that says we will buy our oil exclusively from them? (And any other friendly nation). It would set a floor for petroleum products but it would create certainty also. Then the US gov't would invest the necessary money (directly or through contractors) to exploit the oil sands. Then make it a law the US can only get their petroleum products from friendly nations.

I don't have the exact prices but I think $30 oil would be $2.00 or so gas. I can live with that. It would also let the nutbags in the Middle East who hate us soil their own nest and we could leave them alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. I dunno - once the oil companies get a taste of
these obscene profits it's going to be hard to wean themselves off the $3+ per gallon prices. Hell, they still have to pay the CEO of Exxon almost $1/2 billion don't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
2. $300? Extractions costs are enormous.
I think your numbers are off by a factor of 10 and that the price of a gallon of gas would be on the order of $12/gallon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. Would still be the same price.
They would just tax the hell out of it for Companies like Halliburton & that little thing we have going on in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brundle_Fly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. America can't
the US dollar is the currency for trading oil, removing themselves as a purchaser from OPEC would allow the Middle Eastern gas countries to start trading in the EURO.

This is essentially the same as calling in a debt as the US gets pretty much free reign on the money injected....

basically it would be a massive blow to the US dollar and economy, something like what happened in Argentina a few years back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. This is not true
Name another time in history when a commodity has changed it's trading currency that crashed the currency. It has never happened.

Same as calling in a debt? Please explain to me. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brundle_Fly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. hmm...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MacDuff Donating Member (34 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. Goodbye $30/barrel
Well, oil isn't $30 a barrel - it's trading above $74/barrel on the world market - most likely because we've reached Peak Oil - the point where world demand exceeds world supply (note this does not mean world oil production has peaked necessarily, just that demand has exceeded supply) - what you are seeing now is a bidding war where only those buyers with deep pockets will be able to afford the oil - poor countries who do not produce oil will begin to drop out as the price heads up.

As for tar sands - the biggest (two) problems are 1) the ENORMOUS amount of natural gas that processing the sands requires (at a time when natural gas is becoming more scarce and expensive) - and 2) the amount of water that processing the sands requires - and of course the vile waste water left over... Tar Sands (along with other non-conventional sources) have a poor EROI (energy return on investment) compared to crude - they will help deal with America's thirst for driving, but not solve the cost issues - today's prices make go up and down a little - but I would get used to them, and start figuring out how to have a life that relies less on gas-guzzling autos.

We are being told that gas is so expensive because of refining bottlenecks (mostly) - and there is some truth to this on the east coast, where they are switching to ethanol as an additive - but the truth is, crude imports to the US are DOWN since February, which really only makes sense (at high prices like we are seeing) if Peak Oil has occured (as some believe happened in Decemeber 2005).

If you are interested in learning more about Peak Oil, and discussions of associated issues - I suggest you look into or
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. DU GD Groupthink Violation


2002 (+) 1.8 M bbl/dy Price $20/bbl-> $31/bbl
2003 (+) 3.4 M bbl/dy Price $31/bbl-> $31/bbl
2004 (+) 2.4 M bbl/dy Price $31/bbl-> $42/bbl
2005 (+) 0.3 M bbl/dy Price $42/bbl-> $62/bbl
2006 ~ 0 (a)M bbl/dy Price $62/bbl-> $71/bbl

(a) all indications are that supply in 06 has fallen.

So, in the face of increasing price, we have a steady increase in production, just as one would expect (even in 2002/03 with the overlay of the Iraq buildup/invasion ~ sabre rattling).

Then, suddenly, in 2005, production flatlines.

Price drop? No.

Recession reducing demand? No.

OPEC, a cartel that could not even keep it's act together during the relatively low prices of the 90's oil glut, finally are working in unison, and contrary to past (seemingly annual now) statements that the current price of oil is too high? I wasn't born yesterday.

Oh, but no. The high prices can't be that of which we shall not speak.

It just has to be Big Oil collusion Bushco sabre rattling Ahjad sabre rattling lack of investment OPEC collusion Chindia demand . . . and on and on and on. . .

Yet, nearly every article mentions 'supply problems', in passing, always secondary to the talking point of the day.

There is a lot of money to be made in the initial stages of that of which we shall not speak, some of which will not be made if the 'consumers' catch wind of the unmentionable, and begin to make other economic and political arrangements.

Sarcasm Off: I fully agree with everything you posted. EROEI/Thermodynamics (re: tar sands, oil shale, deep water, <insert non-conventional source here> ) looks like it is going to cause the effects of that of which we shall not speak to hit harder and faster than most of us who have followed this issue imagined. Matt Simmons, in an interview I heard recently, noted that ~0.9 M bbl/dy of US domestic production is from stripper wells where the petroleum energy extracted is less than the electrical energy used in pumping.

On the refinery issue I feel we have been somewhat played. Then again, the private sector is not in the business maintaining excess capacity, or building capacity for feedstock that may not exist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC