Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why can't we have one gas formulation that's used in every State?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 04:39 PM
Original message
Why can't we have one gas formulation that's used in every State?
I understand some formulas have been adopted because of heavier polution in certain areas, but it IS more expensive to make dozens of different formulas than if we had only one. Why can't we just adopt te best one to curb polution and be done with this mess?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. So the cheapos in Kentucky can continue to pummel the east coast
with acid rain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AValdoux Donating Member (738 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. Make it as complicated as possible
Then they can blame the environmentalist for high gas prices.


AValdoux
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ioo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. I have always thought that... here is what we do...
We look at the most clean say CA, we put the WHOLE nation to 75% of the CA gas...

I think that the nation as a whole would be cleaner...

and we are done!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfkrfk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 06:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
22. why does one state decide for others?
btw, how do you know it's cleaner?

do you believe everything you read?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TX-RAT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. Excellent question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
huskerlaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. Because we live in a country where
a large percentage of the population still believes that global warming is a myth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Global warming is a myth but gay marriage is dangerous in their minds
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PerceptionManagement Donating Member (226 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. Because the Oil Monopoly wouldn't like that.
What were you thinking?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. That would be WAY too simple. And make too much sense.
This is America, remember?

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. The whole thing is a bogus excuse for why the prices are high.
There isn't any real effort involved in that formulation thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. I have to disagree with you on that.
I worked for a long time for a company that manufactured vitamins. I bet we had 35 different formulations of vitamin C! Well guess what. Every time you made a different formula, you had to do a change over. That took anywhere from 4 hours to 16 hours, even though almost all the ingredients were the same!!!!!

Change overs are expensive, and that is a fact for the oil industry as well as any other manufacturing business.

To complicate matters, you end up with more of one product than another. If demand increases for one v's another unexpectidly, the consumer is hurt!!!

I don't car is this sounds too simplistic for some of you. Sometimes the simple solution is the best one!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. This is a seasonal adjustment, you can bet that they waste no
time in making that changeover. I'll bet that they don't even miss a beat, no down time, like everything else in a refinery operation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. I'm not buyin the seasonal adjustment story!
They've been producing multiple formulations of gas for years, and other than a slight blip, we experienced NOTHING!

You're buying into the BS of the oil companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lexingtonian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
9. That would be Socialism, you pinko Commie Liberal.

That would be efficient and fair and wouldn't lend itself to easy abuses of the consumers and profiteering.

And you know we can't have that. It would be outright un-American.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. HAH. Thanks. Made me smile in the midst of my rant! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUHandle Donating Member (580 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
10. The EPA requires it
in some States and there is no choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. The EPA does not require that some states have lower standards.
If all states held to the higest EPA standard, the standardization would offset the cost of the higher quality fuel -- mass production is always cheaper than piecework. It would simplify the refining, production, storage and transport because it would all be one product.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Thanks! My fingers weren't quite fast enough to post the same thing!
Even the people in KS, IA, WY and all the other sparsly populated areas would still benefit because the overall production costs would be less, and the end cost to the customer would come down.

If I can understand this, why cant the "smart attorney legislaters" in DC understand that too????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUHandle Donating Member (580 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #10
23. My post was about gasoline and not air quality standards
I live in Southeastern Wisconsin.

Since about 1995, a different blend of gasoline has been sold and is required.

Elsewhere in State, “real” gasoline is sold.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
16. Gasoline is formulated for different altitudes and temperatures.
To say nothing of the varying seasons. There is no way one grade/blend of gasoline would work in all areas of the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Why? Was it always this way?
I'm not trying to argue with you, but to gain information I've never heard.

I know Calif. gas is a special blend, and that's a story all by itself! But there are areas of the country where one formula is OK in one county and not the next! I understand the difference altitude makes in many things, but that's one excues I've never heard. Surely there haven't always been many different formulas. Please explain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 06:25 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Gas has to be more volatile in the winter to ease getting your
car started. That same volatility in the summer will vapor lock your car and/or cause it to run very lean. Altitude has a bearing on this also. Using gas formulated for 100°+ days in -30° winters will make for very hard starting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KitchenWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 06:33 AM
Response to Original message
21. Climate
In northern states we have two different blends. One for summer and one for winter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC