Cspan 1

[Oversea Visitor]

Debate in congress on bill to pass sanction on countries dealing with Iran.
Me think your Congress critters need to talk to other country.
Why deal me they want to LORD over everyone
Me think
US going get a BIG FUCK OFF from lots of countries from this

JUST me thoughts
BUT they debating on wheather to pass this bill right now
Lets see how crazy it will get :rofl:

Dear me they are a suckers for more pain :rofl:

[Talismom]

1. I think the US deserves to get a BIG FUCK OFF from lots of

countries for this! Welcome and thanks for your input!

[lyonn]

2. Ron Paul on now with opinion, could be interesting

Now Kicinich speaking on the same issue with same theory as Paul. Don't like this legislation (or whatever it is called) no forcing Iran, no war drums.

[Viva_La_Revolution]

3. I've been watching...

The hyperbole is astounding.

[Viva_La_Revolution]

4. Kucinich up now

He and Ron Paul are the only two sane ones today. :(

[lyonn]

5. Why do we need legislation for sanctions against Iran?

What is this really about? Paul & Kicinich seem to worry this gives an OK to possible war if sanctions don't work??

[Oversea Visitor]

6. Was watching earlier

Resolution allow for unlimited funding for purpose of regime change in Iran.
What is an act of war :crazy:
Think all should read resolution, it is bad.
It allow funding for covert activities.

I am sorry this an undeclared ACT OF WAR against a country that in not a threat to the US.
Iran can buy nuke for heaven sake
Why go down path to hell
If they want nuke they can buy it PERIOD
Why make enemy of a country that in the first place is not an enemy of US.

[lyonn]

7. Kucinich was on again stating that he wanted an amendment

So many Dems are for this Resolution. If Paul and Kicinich is against it we need to listen up. This could be another bs, through the back door piece of legislation to get us into war, in other words, allow the president to make the decision. Worry, worry!

[Oversea Visitor]

16. Dont you know

There is already a sanction on Iran by US

So you see they need to have a new resolution for sanction while there is already a sanction in place :rofl:

I guess they want a better sanction :rofl:

Or was in the part that authorize fund for regime change
Or was it authorisation to legalise regime change

[lyonn]

8. This post should get more attention

If you had put something about Iran Resolution in the title it might have gotten more attention. This is serious.

Edit:
Franks is hostile on the floor about the lack of time allowed for speeches. I hear much shouting about the possibility of Iran attacking us. Sounds like Iraq 101.

[Idioteque]

9. This resolution doesn't really seem that bad...

...I don't know much about it but John Lewis, Bernie Sanders, Jerry Nadler, Sherrod Brown, and a bunch of other progressives have cosponsored it. It seems like a very small minority of Democrats opposes it.

[lyonn]

10. Conyers up now against this spying thingy in the House

[lyonn]

11. So far vote is close, 111 to 96. 220 votes left

[Oversea Visitor]

14. Did it

pass?

[bdamomma]

12. didn't we do the same thing to Iraq

sanctions lead to war don't they? this is what these thugs are counting on. just sickening.

[joanski0]

13. I heard Jim McGovern from Massachusetts

say that the bill authorizes regime change, and to him that same the same as allowing war. Kucinich said much of the same thing. He said Iraq started out this very same way and have we learned nothing?

Meanwhile, the crooks are getting their way in the Senate, as well.

Debbie Stabanow tried to introduce an amendment getting a $500 rebate for gas before Labor Day. Thad Cochrane wouldn't let it be introduced. Made a point of order.

[annabanana]

15. k&r. . . . . n/t