Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rove denies target letter (false alarm?)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
julialnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 04:02 PM
Original message
Rove denies target letter (false alarm?)
Edited on Wed Apr-26-06 04:04 PM by julialnyc
Rove spokesman says he didn't receive target letter

RAW STORY
Published: Wednesday April 26, 2006

Print This | Email This
Asked about a Truthout report which asserted that Karl Rove had received a so-called "target letter," a spokesman for Rove told Salon's Michael Scherer that the report is "utterly false."

The section of the United States Attorney manual pertaining to target notification does not specify the form in which the notice is to be delivered. In other words, the spokesman's assertion that Rove did not receive a target letter does not resolve whether Rove received notice of any kind.

If Rove did not receive a letter, the lack of a target notice does not necessarily mean that Rove is not a target. The manual does not require that targets be notified before indictment; it simply states that the prosecutor is "encouraged" to notify targets before seeking an indictment against them.

READ MORE FROM SALON.COM'S TIM GRIEVE

DEVELOPING....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. "utterly false" perfect description of republicon culture of corruption
and treason
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. like he's going to admit it? Spokesman is not his lawyer
watching and waiting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. Right -- maybe Fitz advised him when they met earlier today
Edited on Wed Apr-26-06 04:08 PM by LSparkle
I could swear I heard that KKKarl, Fitz and Luskin met this morning before KKKarl went to the Grand Jury this afternoon. (Or did I hear something wrong?) Also, I don't think Scooter received a target *letter* ... ??

On edit: KKKarl might not have received the letter anyway (if there was one); maybe this would have been sent to his attorney and not to him directly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. Actually, the Truthout story says
the letter was sent to Luskin, Rove's attorney. I don't know if that makes a difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. In BushWorld, it sure does
They are the KINGS of parsing their words ... The fact they say KKKarl didn't receive it is intentional (and misleading).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chimichurri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. i agree. Butchering language is how they manage to win
everytime. I think he's playing a game here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
julialnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. salon article
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. Rove has said a lot of things in the past that don't jive with the facts
Maybe he got a target letter; maybe he didn't.

Perhaps Tony Snow can start his duties by asking Karl if he got a target letter and telling the WH press corps what Karl tells him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. But he CAN'T comment about it from behind that podium
because it's part of an *ongoing investigation* ... !!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnfunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
8. Rove didn't receive it -- LUSKIN did!
That's one way to weasel out of an answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. And you win the prize!!!!!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
12. So in other words he did get one.
HAHA! I hope Rove gets at least 20 - 50 years in prison!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
julialnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I don't think he did get one (or Luskin)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
julialnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. snipped...
Edited on Wed Apr-26-06 04:29 PM by julialnyc
Rove Testifies for 5th Time in CIA Leak Case
By William Branigin and Jim VandeHei
Washington Post Staff Writers
Wednesday, April 26, 2006; 5:09 PM

Top presidential adviser Karl Rove testified today before a federal grand jury investigating the 2003 leak of a CIA operative's identity, appearing "voluntarily and unconditionally" at the request of the chief federal prosecutor, Rove's attorney said.

In a statement issued upon the conclusion of Rove's testimony at the federal courthouse in Washington, attorney Robert D. Luskin said the special counsel in the case, U.S. Attorney Patrick J. Fitzgerald, had advised Rove that he was "not a target of the investigation." However, Luskin said Fitzgerald has not made any decision about charges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. And you believe Luskin because.....????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. We'll have to see
I wouldn't necessarily take Luskin at face value.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. If you don't think he got a target letter, then I submit that you....
...haven't learned how to interpret what you hear and read from the NeoCon Junta. Here's a hint: They parse everything, and rely heavily on misdirection.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smomfr Donating Member (227 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Scooter for two cigarettes, Kkkarl two packs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC