Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sooo the 952nd Engineering Company has been called up

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 05:12 PM
Original message
Sooo the 952nd Engineering Company has been called up
and will join 5 other units. What significance is this, if any?
>>>snip
The 952nd Engineer Company is a support group responsible for horizontal construction including airfields, parking lots, roads and bridges.

http://theparisnews.com/story.lasso?wcd=26394
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Perhaps recent revelations about Haliburton not doing their jobs
is propmting Dick & Rummy to force the military to help the 'private contractors' out yet again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Or perhaps to build landing strips ?
Who really knows?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Any new info about what is shakin on Diego Garcia?
Am far from the military construction corps loop these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Master Mahon Donating Member (621 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Building bridges
For Bush, Rumsfeld, et al to use to FLEE TO SAFETY perhaps?

:+
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. If they are using Air Force as ground troops, engineers may
not being doing what they were initially designated to do. Just saying. Halliburton or a subsidiary is probably doing all the construction.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. exactly what I was thinking
I have a niece in the Air Force who may be called up. She is in computers and now may be in the sand. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Best wishes to her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yes, hard to tell. They have been calling up veterinarians to do water
testing. Vets have some training in that kind of thing,
but it is a bit of a stretch.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. Crossing the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers?
It's a bridging unit. Conducting a ground assault from Iraq into Iran requires crossing two major rivers--and fording rivers in a tank is exceptionally difficult. (The Soviet Army was the world's expert in fording rivers in tanks, and they lost so many tanks during river-crossing training in East Germany that they finally paved part of the bottom of the Oder River. And they STILL lost tanks there!)

I don't think it's a warning shot at Halliburton--they do damn near anything they want, or DON'T do damn near anything they want, and still get paid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. IF this is true
My bet is that Halliburton doesn't want to build that particular bridge-so they insource the troops to do the more hazardous work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-26-06 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Yes, Horse, you're absolutely right
Think back to the start of the war, when Halliburton wouldn't take supplies to the troops (even though we were paying them massively) because they were afraid of getting killed.

This would be worse--they'd be going into a hot area with intent to make it hotter.

Another thing to consider: Halliburton is many things (almost all of them bad) but so far they don't seem to be mercenaries. That's Blackwater's job and Blackwater doesn't do heavy construction. Part of the job description for Combat Engineers is "fight as infantry." If Halliburton was tasked to bridge the Tigris and/or the Euphrates in preparation for a ground assault on Iran--an act which would rank near the top of the list of stupid shit attributable to George Bush's reign of error--they'd be required to fight as infantry. (They'd be moving from one hot area to another one...and something tells me that if the Iranian Army invades Iraq to kick the US Army's ass, Bush will have finally fulfilled his campaign promise to be a uniter in that the Iranian Army will unite with the Old Iraqi Army as they fight the US Army.)

In a situation such as this, the military is going to have to do the bridging operations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC