Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kucinich:Only 1 Way To Stop Gouging At The Pump: 100% Excess Profits Tax

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Tanyah Donating Member (69 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 08:47 PM
Original message
Kucinich:Only 1 Way To Stop Gouging At The Pump: 100% Excess Profits Tax
WASHINGTON - April 26 - Congressman Dennis J. Kucinich (D-OH), author of HR 2070, a bill to place a 100% excess profit tax on the oil companies, gave the following speech today on the House floor on the rising cost of gasoline:

“Congress must break the hold that the oil companies have on the politics of our country. The American people are demanding action. The price of gasoline has climbed to over $3 a gallon, heading towards $4 a gallon and maybe $5.

“Since 2001, the five largest oil companies have made over $280 billion in profits. Exxon Mobil alone made $36 billion in profits in the last year.

“There is only one way to stop the oil and gas companies from an endless series of increases in the price of gasoline.

“Almost fifty Members of Congress have now signed onto my bill, HR 2070, for a 100% excess profits tax on oil companies’ profiteering.

“This act does not tax the price of gasoline, so it will not increase the cost. However, by taxing excessive profits, it puts the brakes on price gouging and will lower the price of gasoline.

“Congress can not stand by while the oil companies are stealing from the American people.”

http://www.commondreams.org/news2006/0426-06.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mconvente Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. alright! go dennis!
Who knows if we'll get any repuke support (doubt it) but it shows the people of America that Democrats are the ones leading on this issue. Welcome to DU! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. An Opposition Party that was tired of being the Opposition Party
would get behind this in a big way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. Good idea, kick for a good idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is too socialist for me
Edited on Thu Apr-27-06 08:57 PM by TheFarseer
Who's to say what "excess profits" are? I'm all for a tax on oil company windfall profits based on some kind of percentage but this is a bit overboard. If this goes through (not like I think it will), they have no incentive to keep down costs like $400 million dollar retirement packages and 2 million dollar parties with caviar and ice sculptures. Might as well waste as much money as possible since you can only have so much profit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. too easy to corrupt. the president appoints all 3 board members
and the board determines what is a reasonable profit.

so shrub appoints mr. and mrs. lay to the board and a token democrat and by 2-1, the reasonable profit for a gallon of gas is $10.00, which means that shrub can sign this into law with much fanfare and it never does a damn thing.

NO TEETH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. How do you determine excess profits?
First, I want to say that I think there should be some sort of excess profits tax...

But, how do you do it?

ExxonMobil made $36 billion last year. However, their revenues were around $360 billion in total, meaning their net was 10 cents on the dollar

By contrast, Pfizer made a "mere" $8.1 billion last year, on revenues of "only" $51 billion. However, they made over 15 cents on the dollar, a much higher rate of profit than ExxonMobil.

On the other side, Wal-Mart also had over $300 billion in revenues, but their profits were a fraction of ExxonMobil's at

Do you tax anybody over a certain dollar amount of profit? Do you tax them over a certain revenue threshold & profit rate? Do you then worry about big corps playing more accounting tricks to avoid paying the excess tax?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
7. Morning kick for DK
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC