|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Catherine Vincent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-28-06 07:19 PM Original message |
Bush says David Gregory wouldn't pass a Background Check |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pinto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-28-06 07:20 PM Response to Original message |
1. frat boy humor...Heh, heh, heh. Smirk. Smirk. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joemurphy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-28-06 07:20 PM Response to Original message |
2. Gregory's one of the few White House reporters that tries to do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gabi Hayes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-28-06 07:21 PM Response to Original message |
3. the BEST part about that, which I saw, too, is that there's NO WAY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-28-06 07:22 PM Response to Original message |
4. Gregory embarrassed him by asking a question in French |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gabi Hayes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-28-06 07:24 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. the entrepreneur story, unfortunately, is most likely not true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-28-06 07:23 PM Response to Original message |
5. Both MSNBC and CNN positioned this encouter as Bush Shows Sense of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-28-06 08:33 PM Response to Reply #5 |
25. Shocking betrayal by Brokaw in Newsmax |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fridays Child (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-28-06 07:24 PM Response to Original message |
6. That means that Gregory is a definite burr under the chimp's saddle. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gabi Hayes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-28-06 07:25 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. yeah...but he SUCKED this week as a replacement for Tweety |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gatorboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-28-06 07:34 PM Response to Reply #10 |
19. He's a good reporter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-28-06 08:41 PM Response to Reply #10 |
26. He did suck...but Imus questioned him about his wife and family so I |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-28-06 07:28 PM Response to Reply #6 |
14. I thought it was bur for the seedpod thingy... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fridays Child (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-28-06 07:36 PM Response to Reply #14 |
22. Bur and burr are interchangeable. I'm not sure, though... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Velveteen Ocelot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-28-06 07:25 PM Response to Original message |
8. Here's what they said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-28-06 07:31 PM Response to Reply #8 |
17. Thank you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-28-06 07:32 PM Response to Reply #8 |
18. Thats our pretzeldent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KeepItReal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-28-06 07:25 PM Response to Original message |
9. "Thank you for your penetrating question. Plus I'm not going to hire you" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Neil Lisst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-28-06 07:25 PM Response to Original message |
11. "Well you ought to know, Mr. President! You've got me tapped!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-28-06 07:31 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. No, he should have asked "would Jeff Gannon pass?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WannaJumpMyScooter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-28-06 07:26 PM Response to Original message |
12. I would be honored not to pass a background check |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pdxmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-28-06 07:26 PM Response to Original message |
13. Wow! Gregory must have done something REALLY bad, cause |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoodleyAppendage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-28-06 07:28 PM Response to Original message |
15. For once, I'd LOVE to hear the reporter retort back, "FUCK YOU, ASSHOLE." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CrazyOrangeCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-28-06 07:34 PM Response to Reply #15 |
20. Yep, that person would be a hero forever. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HysteryDiagnosis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-28-06 07:35 PM Response to Original message |
21. So David is eligible for the prez's job, but who would want to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shain from kane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-28-06 08:10 PM Response to Original message |
23. The Supreme Court waived his background check. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wherewingstakedream (485 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-28-06 08:18 PM Response to Original message |
24. This from the guy who wanted to make |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:32 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC