|
Well, I just finished a conversation with an evangelical who was inviting me to some program at his church about Flight 93. . .and you know, just like the Jehovah's Witnesses and the Church of Latter-Day Saints, the new fundies like to knock on doors in hopes of recruiting people to their religious philosophy. Usually I just say that I'm not interested and close the door, but today I felt particularly annoyed at being interrupted and when I opened the door I surprised myself by directly engaging this man.
Since I'm an adult graduate student, I live in a state-owned complex on a university campus, meaning the only people living here are adult students (mostly graduate students) and families. When he made his pitch and quickly saw how annoyed I was by looking in my eyes, I tried to (politely, but rather coldly) respond that as a legal adult I found it bothersome that certain people of religious persuasion seem to think that I'm not capable of making my own spiritual decisions without their attempts to recruit and that I resented the idea that their church apparently believed that a place of residence, solely populated by legal adults, should be open to their solicitation simply because THEY believed others should be making the spiritual choices THEY want them to make. Then I quoted the part of my state constitution which says: "Every man is entitled to worship God according to his own conscience" and pointedly asked what problem his church has with that notion. . .
He was clearly shocked, and I think he was looking at me as if I was a member of satan's cult. . .an idea that could have easily been accentuated since I had been lying on the sofa and my hair was a mess and I hadn't shaved yet at 1 p.m. on a Saturday afternoon....hahahaha...
His response was rather slow as he tried to figure out how to be diplomatic, but he annoyed me even more when he said "You mean that you don't like anyone coming to your home to share something...or to sell something?" I responded that, by far, the people who interrupt the sanctity of my home are those of a particular "conservative" religious faith, and that I found their intentions disrespectful of the fact that God created me a certain way, that I have a rather productive and congenial relationship with God, and that I believed I was born just fine the first time without having to challenge God's intentions by being "born again." I think that caught him off-guard for a moment, so he asked if I treated everyone who came to my home like that. . .especially if they were soliciting something. I told him that on two occasions in FOUR years, I had cable television people knock and a girl scout who lived in the complex asking me to purchase cookies. So naturally, being a persecuted "christian" that all "conservatives" claim to be, he said "oh, so you think that was okay but it's not okay for people to share their religious beliefs with others."
Well, I kinda surprised him - because I said "No, it's not. This is MY home. The people who live here are all adults who make their own decisions about their relationship with God and their own spiritual journey. There are many Muslims, some Buddhists, some christians of other faiths living here, along with probably some atheists and agnostics. All of them have made their own decisions based on using their right to choose those experiences - and that I view door-to-door recruiting attempts as disrespectful of the ability of individuals to drive through town and select any church they might be interested in attending. After all, I said, it's not like your church is some underground organization which no one could identify - and that there are churches on every street corner which any one of us can choose to walk in, or go with a friend, or make a selection at any time.
That really threw him off, particularly when I added that I felt my own journey with God was none of his business, since deeply-held personal beliefs are just THAT - PERSONAL - and not applicable to judging the lives of others, yet I believe you represent a church which feels entitled to promoting just that judgement by assuming that each of us are souls to "harvest" simply because we don't belong to that church. I added that I found evangelicals who followed the teachings of televangelists as gospel to be greatly deficient in personal critical thinking skills and appeared to be inherently insecure...and then added, yes, I just judged you - and that's what happens when you violate my rights by assuming my home is a proper place to impose your "sharing" of faith at YOUR leisure.
I then told him that his church obviously turns more people away because it is determined that America is supposed to be a theocracy, and I figured he'd protest about America being a "christian" nation - which he didn't - so before he could say anything I added that I don't believe that James Dobson, Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson or Rev. Moon represented my religious beliefs and that I was more than tired of seeing them being portrayed as the personal spokesmodels for God. He did agree with me on that one - which surprised me - though I must admit he still looked rather taken aback at my brazenness. (note - don't bother me when I'm lying on the sofa with my eyes just about to take a nap).
So I told him about Paul Cameron (famous fundie junk scientist -and like many sheeple who really don't know anything more than what they are told by the minister, he didn't know who the anti-gay junker is) . . .and told him I found that people who were deliberately deceptive as not very representative of God. I padded that with some rather poignant stories of gay couples I knew who had suffered greatly because of the STUPID state statutes that only allowed distant relatives to make choices about their funerals - rather than the people they LIVED with for 20 years. I rather pointedly explained that death, just like life, is a personal journey which the State nor the Church should be directing, and most certainly not interfering with the rights of a couple of any kind to be buried next to each other simply to satisfy some church across town.
He got visibly nervous then, and said that he'd disagree with me there, and started edging away from me. . .like he wanted to get out of there....hahaha. He said that I don't understand that it WOULD affect him, but that we'd just have to agree to disagree. . .and then I really surprised myself. I responded rather quickly..."No, we don't agree to disagree. It's not about you. It has nothing to do with you because it isn't YOU. That's the problem with your "religion" - you think everyone else's life is all about YOU - and it isn't.
He did excuse himself rather quickly, but thanked me for the chance to meet me . . .and yes, I was a bitch and should have been more courteous...after all, did I have much CHOICE but to meet him? I have no peephole to see who is actually AT the door. . .
The good thing about this experience for me is that I honestly had a chance to really test myself in conversation beyond a couple of fast remarks with one of these people - and I took the offense immediately. I think, when he figured out I was likely gay, that signaled his recoiling a little. . .though I'd rather think that he suddenly saw the bright light of truth and it scared him just like the Muslim living around the corner of the building would have ten minutes earlier. . .well, okay...I can hope.
But the revelation I got about myself in this encounter was that I rendered him without much argument, and he must have sensed that as he beat a hasty retreat, particularly about the gay funeral issue. It really dawned on me quite clearly that these people really DO think that everyone's life is about THEM, and that gives them the inherent right to attempt to "correct" it according to their own beliefs in God. And when it comes to things like those funeral examples, it really hit me in a much more clearly defined way than ever before, just how selfish and self-centered these people are to believe that someone else's funeral arrangements directly affected THEM. . .that two people in a gay relationships shouldn't be buried next to each other because it might offend HIS idea of GOD. I actually really understood what this is all about - they have no respect for anyone else's constitutional rights, no real respect for other's religious choices, and no respect for individual sovereignty from state interference.
If my state ends up with a marriage amendment proposal, I'm ready for battle. And these people are going to be exposed for the petty, self-serving, demanding, interlopers of human rights they truly are. . .
I'll have to check with the university housing office on Monday, because I do have an increasing issue with these door-to-door solicitations on university property. This isn't the "free speech" forum that the university forces all of us to use if WE want to exercise our rights - and this isn't a maintenance issue. This is also not an issue where an ON-CAMPUS ministry or student group is soliciting - and yes, I would have certainly handled them differently, but then they would likely not knock on the door - they would just post flyers like any other campus group. This was an OFF-CAMPUS church and thus, it would seem to me they should seek permission to go door-to-door, particularly in housing.
Ok...so I was a bitch and I wasn't very giving. . .and yes, I was judgemental. . .so I guess my penance should be that I let ya'll beat me up. . .:-).
|