a list, for example, of what would have been useful, popular actions that were proposed by Democrats in Congress and rejected/blocked and even prevented from being proposed--by those obstructivists who call themselves Republicans.
Maybe a table showing "We (Americans) could have had:" in column one, and "Except Republicans obstructed/prevented it by:" in column two. Thus giving details of the "real" and useful
ideas put forth by Democrats (who supposedly don't have or submit any "ideas"), while also detailing just how the Republicans prevented such beneficial proposals (likely including some pretty damning dirty tricks).
It seems to me that an awfully large percentage of Americans out there are still ignorant of just how totally Democrats have been excluded from even the smallest participation in Congress (leaving them with no other options than to "obstruct" the Republicans (not to mention that even those options have been severely limited)). So many people, unaware that Democrats haven't had more than the tiniest say in what Congress has been doing, are blaming both sides equally (if not equally, then blaming Democrats even more).
Analogia:
If you assigned a project to solve a problem/do a job, to ten students and broke them into two subgroups, one with six students and one with four--whereupon the group of six used their majority vote to rule that the group of four could not participate or even propose any ideas or make any suggestions--and, at most, could only quietly complain or try to stop the implementation of various propositions made by the group of six (but only by trying to convince individual members of the group of six not to support his own group's choices)... When the project fails miserably--it would hardly be fair to blame the members of the group of four. Americans often have a sense of fairness, and if they understood that the group of four had no real part in the project, they would tend not to blame them.
It's shocking, actually, that such a large percentage of the law making body of our government would be so excluded; it's almost equally shocking that the news media avoids mentioning it--and probably even more amazing that the Democrats themselves don't seek to make it more evident (I'm imagining they have some political/strategic reasons for doing so and aren't just being quiet out of embarrassment or hurt pride). Nevertheless, it seems to me that a great many citizens don't understand the current malfunctioning of our Congress and that if they did understand (including how much harm it has done to us), they would not only not blame the Democrats--but they'd even go outside their normal partisan voting tendencies and vote for Democrats (when the Democrat appears to be reasonably respectable/honorable/intelligent as an individual) in order to correct this imbalance. Perhaps that's just wishful thinking--but in many cases, at least it would result in a proper re-apportioning of the blame (away from Democrats and onto those who actually made the bad decisions of the last nearly six years).
Still, just to show what could have been, what Democrats tried to propose--and shed light on how the Republicans "obstructed" such progressive efforts; would be an important part of any attempt to restore the people's support for Democrats for Congress. Add the titillating, behind the scenes dirty Republican tricks employed, while showing how Republicans "excluded" Democrats from doing the very jobs we, the people, elected them to do... and we're on the road to turning this situation around.