Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Phony Threat, Phony Defense

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 05:56 PM
Original message
Phony Threat, Phony Defense
"Our missile systems are modest, our anti-ballistic missile systems are modest. They're new. It's new research. We've gotten -- testing them. And so I can't -- it's hard for me to give you a probability of success. But, nevertheless, the fact that a nontransparent society would be willing to tee up a rocket and fire it without identifying where it's going or what was on it means we need a ballistic missile system.

I think we had a reasonable chance of shooting it down."
-- Bush, press conference July 7


What better illustration do we need of the hollow game played out by NK and the Bush regime, at everyone else's expense? Bush is boasting about a U.S. missile defense that won't work as a response to NK missiles that won't fly.

Brilliant. The object of the U.S. and NK is to war without actually attacking each other. An actual attack would queer the game, force a resolution, eliminate a valuable nemesis. That's why we didn't see Bush attack the missile sites before the launch. There was virtually NO chance any of own our missiles could have intercepted the NK missiles and detonated them in mid-air. Bush knows this. There was virtually no chance that NK was going to hit anything significant with their missile launches. The NK president knew this before he launched them.

This just a clumsy invitational dance in the new cold war that the Bush regime is orchestrating and encouraging, hoping that a few 'evil avis' members will step into the spotlight. Bush's posturing as the protector of the country and the world demands a perpetual enemy to justify the continuing militarism.

By scrapping the talks that the Clinton administration were engaged in with NK, the Bush regime invited NK to resume their only activity that makes them relevant to the U.S. and the rest of the world. The NK nuclear program is basically the only way that they can manage a voice in the international arena, where NK desperately needs to pressure interested nation-states into concessions and incentives against their potential nuclear mis-behavior.

It's not so far-fetched to conclude that neither NK, nor the Bush regime, is interested in resolving the nuclear standoff and confrontation with retaliation or diplomacy. From Bush's refusal to either attack NK head-on as he's threatened or sit down and talk it out with them, to NK's sloppy provocation, there is a familiar pattern that will not be lost on those of us who lived with the jingoistic trappings and remnants of the Cold War with the Soviet Union and China. The result then, as is intended by the Bush regime now, is to foster a generation of militarism and military spending in which their manufactured antagonism provides the political fuel for Congress to keep the money spigot open wide, benefiting the military industry cronies that infect our government.

The time has long come when we must cast aside our faith that our leaders will eventually realize our own designs for America. Our Democrats have gone only as far as their numbers have allowed, and they act as if their biggest fear is losing more political ground. But the ground has already shifted underneath them. The forces of the military right rule the halls of Congress by wielding the products of the jingoistic fear they have exploited from the 9-11 attacks. Our representatives and legislators who argue for compromise or balance as they allow these military actions to go on; as they continue to allow the Executive to spy on Americans without a warrant; as they sit in silence as Bush threatens to bomb yet another sovereign nation (Iran) with impunity, cause us all to be complicit in their cowardice.

Bush did his best to avoid the sacrifices that hundreds of thousands of his generation made in Vietnam when he had the opportunity. Yet, he has had no compunction about sending hundreds of thousands of his countryfolk to fight, kill, and die in his opportunistic invasion and occupation of Iraq. The deaths of our soldiers are rarely mentioned by Bush, the deaths of the hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians caught in the line of his aggression are hardly an afterthought to him. It matters little to him that real people 'on the ground' are adversely affected by his choice of militarism over the prospect of peace that comes with committed diplomacy.

Our soldiers, our citizens, the Iraqis under our guns, the North Korean citizens, are clearly at the point of the Bush regime's politics. Unfortunately, there will be more political and military meddling, fueling more violence directed at the symbols of the sponsors of the U.S. imperialism, our soldiers and their agents. Until he can find his way into his next brawl with Iran or Syria, North Korea will remain the deliberate, jingoistic symbol of Bush's paranoid fear.

Threatening phony defenses against NK's phony threats make perfect sense in Bush's scheme to reign supreme as a military commander. Bush and his antagonists will always remain unscathed as those caught in the middle of their pathetic power-play are enveloped in their pernicious protection racket. "With us or against us . . . fighting them there . . . bring them on . . ."

"War, it will be seen, is now a purely internal affair. In the past, the ruling groups of all countries, although they might recognize their common interest and therefore limit the destructiveness of war, did fight against one another, and the victor always plundered the vanquished. In our own day they are not fighting against one another at all. The war is waged by each ruling group against its own subjects, and the object of the war is not to make or prevent conquests of territory, but to keep the structure of society intact. The very word "war," therefore, has become misleading. It would probably be accurate to say that by becoming continuous war has ceased to exist." -- Orwell, 1984
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. nudge
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 06:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. final and link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. Great essay bigtree K&R
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 05:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. thanks for reading shadowknows
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 05:24 AM
Response to Original message
4. I knew we were so screwed when I first heard with us or against us
not a soul in this mal-misadministration know anything about diplomacy, you're going to do it my way or else, now come we talk, is not negotiatiing, it dictating.
Kick and Rec.
thanks bigtree
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. thanks for reading madokie
and thanks for the kick :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jazz2006 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. Excellent essay, bigtree.
Edited on Sun Jul-09-06 05:20 PM by Jazz2006
It's not so far-fetched to conclude that neither NK, nor the Bush regime, is interested in resolving the nuclear standoff and confrontation with retaliation or diplomacy. From Bush's refusal to either attack NK head-on as he's threatened or sit down and talk it out with them, to NK's sloppy provocation, there is a familiar pattern that will not be lost on those of us who lived with the jingoistic trappings and remnants of the Cold War with the Soviet Union and China. The result then, as is intended by the Bush regime now, is to foster a generation of militarism and military spending in which their manufactured antagonism provides the political fuel for Congress to keep the money spigot open wide, benefiting the military industry cronies that infect our government.

That is exactly how I have always felt about the current NK/US positions and posturing. I have long felt that the entire play by play has been very deja vu of the Cold War

Excellent essay, very well written. Thanks for sharing it.

Cheers, Jazz

:hi:

Edit to add: pleased to recommend, too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. As always, bigtree...
...words of wisdom, and should be read.

The military culture is self-sustaining. See a new threat? Spend billions in reaction. Got to find those new threats or the money won't flow.

If we had a military that had to live on say, a 100 billion a year, we'd be as safe as ever, but unable to have invaded Iraq. Oh, how I hope for the days of military spending being coralled.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. NK has their own role they play in the game
"North Korea may seem like "a naughty child seeking attention from a parent" but it is also shrewd, said former South African diplomat Jean du Preez.

"The fact is that Iran was center-stage for quite a while and, while you may not agree with it, managed through skillful diplomacy to draw the US to the negotiating table," said Du Preez, now a scholar at the Monterrey Institute for International Studies in California.

"Suddenly North Korea is on the frontburner and Iran is now seeking the attention by threatening not to abide by deadlines," he said. "It’s a cat and mouse game."

A few years ago, neither would have craved climbing to the top spot of Bush’s "axis of evil." But both are gambling that the United States is so bogged down by the insurgency in Iraq that it will choose diplomatic over military options if they play their cards carefully, analysts said."

http://www.mb.com.ph/OPED2006071068942.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. That is the first good thing I've heard...
... about the US being in Iraq.

The occupation of Iraq has us so tied up that the only options left are to use diplomatic measures in other places.

Yeah, but diplomacy doesn't use much oil, munitions, or manpower, so it's of no benefit to the warpublicans and the other warryTM worts.

Which is what war is all about: money.

The new AMERICA: Amount of Money Each Rich Individual Can Accumulate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. the Bush regime desperately wants to re-start 'Star Wars'
hawking their rejected earmarks for missile defense R&D was their first thought. Their plans, revealed earlier in the year, to proliferate 'missile defense' technology to European provinces 'to counter Iran' will get a boost from all of their flailing around over the NK launches.

Basically ANYTHING in the Defense budget that can be remotely linked to some perceived threat gets as much of a rise as Bush can manage in his paranoid rantings.

It's a War Campaign for Bush and his republican cowboys from now until the Nov. elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
10. This needs to go back to the top for the evening crowd
:kick: & :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. nite
tomorrow's another . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Sep 16th 2024, 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC