OK, i know they're bought and paid for by the huge agro/chem corps, and have absolutely no stake at all in the interests of a family farmer, but this is so ludicrous i don't see how they can even say it with a straight face. but then again, it's bushco, and the old parameters of decency and personal responsibility, self respect are gone, dead and buried.
--###--
originalUSDA Says Products Can Be Labeled 'Grass-Fed' Even if Animals Are Feedlot Raised & Fed Hormones & Antibiotics
* Grass-Fed Rule Angers Farmers
By MARIAN BURROS
The New York Times, July 26, 2006
Straight to the Source
THE Agriculture Department has proposed allowing animals to be labeled grass-fed even if they never saw a pasture and were fed antibiotics and hormones.
When Martin E. O'Connor, chief of the standardization branch of the department's livestock and feed program, explained the proposed rule at a conference of the American Grassfed Association in Colorado Springs, Colo., on Friday, members were angry.
Producers of grass-fed animals have waited for years for the department to develop certification standards and procedures, like the organic certification and seal, to distinguish grass-fed animals from conventionally raised animals. When department officials asked for input four years ago, association members replied that the rule should require that an animal be fed on pastures except in emergency circumstances where its life would be threatened, and also that the animal should be free from antibiotics and hormones.
The rule for the voluntary standard that Mr. O'Connor described, which was first announced in May, would require only that the animals be fed a diet that is mother's milk or 99 percent grass, legumes and forage, which is anything taken by browsing or grazing. The rule, which applies to all grass-fed ruminants, including cattle, sheep, goats and bison, is silent on the pasture issue.