Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Plame Leak(s) - By Jason (Don't Read If You Don't Want To) Leopold

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 09:06 AM
Original message
Plame Leak(s) - By Jason (Don't Read If You Don't Want To) Leopold
Edited on Fri Sep-01-06 09:08 AM by kpete
Plame Leak(s)
By Jason Leopold
t r u t h o u t | Report

..............................

Fitzgerald's suspicions about Rove's story turned out to be prescient. Rove failed to tell the grand jury that he had been a source for Cooper. Instead, Rove said he found out about Plame and then subsequently shared information about her with other journalists - including Chris Matthews, the host of MSNBC's "Hardball" - only after Novak published his column.

Explaining the discrepancy to the Special Prosecutor in October 2005, Luskin, Rove's attorney, told Fitzgerald that Rove had truly forgotten about his conversation with Cooper, but Luskin jogged his memory thanks to a tip he says he received from Cooper's Time colleague, Viveca Novak (no relation to the conservative columnist Robert Novak).

Hours before Libby's indictment in October, Luskin told Fitzgerald that he had gone for drinks with Novak in late January or early February 2004 and she had inadvertently revealed that the buzz inside Time magazine was that Rove had been a source for Matt Cooper's story on Plame Wilson.

Luskin told Fitzgerald that Novak's tip prompted him and Rove to conduct an exhaustive search for documentary evidence to determine if Rove had spoken with Cooper. That's when an email Rove sent to the then-deputy national security adviser immediately following Rove's conversation with Cooper turned up, which Luskin said he promptly turned over to Fitzgerald, and which led Rove to change his testimony and disclose that he did speak with Cooper.

more at:
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/090106Z.shtml

Two other interesting Plame articles Wapo smears Joe Wilson and Parry defends him
http://www.consortiumnews.com/2006/090106.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/20...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. I don't know - just reading the name Leopold is enough to
make me furious. As a matter of fact even contemplating the existance of Jason Leopold fills me with rage. It's a good thing I haven't been exposed to any gamma radiation or there'd be lots of trouble.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sperk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I know, cause we all know that it is totally IMPOSSIBLE that
Rove could have been indicted and then cut a deal or Fitz was gotten to. Cause everyone knows that the Bush, Cheney, Rummy cabal could never squirm out of any accountability for any wrong doing.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. and it never happens that reporters ever get anything wrong
and then refuse to accept that they have made a mistake, but arrogantly attack anybody who questions them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. *snort* - Love the headline, kpete!
You kill me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. Just posted this to another thread from Media Matters
Media figures repeat false claim that Armitage role in Plame leak exonerates Libby and Rove

Summary: Numerous media figures have asserted that a recent report purportedly identifying former deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage as Robert Novak's original source for Valerie Plame's identity as a CIA operative prove that Karl Rove and I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby were not involved in the leak of her identity. However, Armitage's role as Novak's first source is not inconsistent with Rove's and Libby's involvements in the leak -- both were original sources of the information for two other reporters.

http://mediamatters.org/items/200609010001
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chat_noir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Rove


However, as Media Matters noted, then-Time magazine White House correspondent Matthew Cooper, in his first-person account (subscription required) of his testimony before the grand jury in the CIA leak investigation, identified Rove as his original source for Plame's identity


As Corn wrote in the August 27 entry of his Capital Games weblog:

Armitage's role aside, the public record is without question: senior White House aides wanted to use Valerie Wilson's CIA employment against her husband. Rove leaked the information to Cooper, and Libby confirmed Rove's leak to Cooper.


http://mediamatters.org/items/200609010001

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deaniac21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
6. Nothing like a little comedy on a Friday!
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LordLovesAWorkingMan Donating Member (272 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
8. It seems to me that
Leopold can make up any story he wants to, so long as it ends with something like, "...but the indictment remains sealed," or, "...but it appears that Rove has wriggled free for now."

The facts, which are determined by things that have actually happened, are diametrically opposed to the horseshit that truthout continues to heap on this nonstory. If Fox News did the same thing, we would have a drinking game about it by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
9. Thanks for posting, Kpete.
This Plame matter is heating up again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC