Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton/Haliburton?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 01:40 PM
Original message
Clinton/Haliburton?
I think I need to stay off this other board - they aren't supposed to talk politics at all but it slips in.O8) Everything is still Clinton's fault.

Can anybody help or should I just ignore it? (thread will get locked as soon as I reply :evilgrin: )

Subject: Taxes

Me: Don't forget one billion dollars per week on our current "foriegn policy" - a good chunk of that going as no-bid contracts to a company once headed by this guy that shot a lawyer in the face down Texas way a while back.

Moran: Yes, Halliburton has been doing a good job for years:

In 1997 Clinton administration awarded Halliburton a $405 million no bid deal to provide support for US troops in Bosnia. Two years later, Halliburton won the 5-year renewal of this deal, valued at $180 million.

In 1999 Clinton went to war against Serbia over Kosovo. Halliburton got a $200 million cost/plus contract to work in Kosovo. That contract, had generated nearly a billion dollars in revenues for Halliburton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I figured it would have some basis in fact, but does anybody
have some snappy comeback stats on casualties or somethign I can throw at them. This is what I started:


I know this will get locked but I need to point out something. I am as disgusted with the Democratic "representatives" that fell for the administration's lies about Iraq as I am with them. Having said that, it is interesting how whenever anybody says anything critical about the CURRENT "leaders", (who's party controls all three branches of government BTW) the defenders ALWAYS jump back to Clinton. Man that guy sure had (has) a lot of influence eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. but not Reagan, right? please. and besides,
none of the people you mentioned were employeed by Haliburton, and none of them stood to directly profit as much as Cheney does.


Cheney is just a tool. That's all he is.

The only reason Haliburton hired him at all, in fact, is because they knew he could give them influence and access.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gidney N Cloyd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. Chicken feed.
I just heard a voice in my head. Sounded like Dr Evil demanding 1 million dollars ransom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gidney N Cloyd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. Tell him 'At least under Clinton No Bid didn't mean No Accountability.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. plus, they didn't have nearly the same type of cost-plus contracts
or the broad scope of services that they had under BushCo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC