Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Newsweek: The 'Islamofascists'.. debate over what to call the bad guys

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
truthpusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 09:00 PM
Original message
Newsweek: The 'Islamofascists'.. debate over what to call the bad guys
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14640535/site/newsweek/

The 'Islamofascists'
Bush's new national-security offensive has been plagued by debate over what to call the bad guys.

By Richard Wolffe and Holly Bailey

Newsweek

Sept. 11, 2006 issue - Last fall White House aides were grappling with a seemingly simple question that had eluded them for years: what should the president, in his many speeches on the war on terror, call the enemy? They were searching for a single clean phrase that could both define the foe and reassure Americans who were confused by a conflict that had grown much bigger than Osama bin Laden. But the answer was anything but simple. Some academics preferred the term "Islamism," but the aides thought that sounded too much as if America were fighting the entire religion. Another option: jihadism. But to many Muslims, it's a positive word that doesn't necessarily evoke bloodshed. Some preferred the conservative buzzword "Islamofascism," which was catchy and tied neatly into Bush's historical view of the struggle.

But when national-security adviser Steve Hadley called the CIA, the Pentagon and the State Department, the experts nixed the idea of a single phrase for a war that was so complex. "There was a conscious desire not to use just one definitive word, because there wasn't a perfect word," recalls Michael Gerson, Bush's chief speechwriter at the time (and now a NEWSWEEK contributor). The result was a rhetorical mishmash. "Some call this evil Islamic radicalism," Bush explained, "others, militant jihadism; still others, Islamofascism. Whatever it's called, this ideology is very different from the religion of Islam."

Five years after 9/11, and more than three years after invading Iraq, President Bush is still searching for the perfect phrase to define the enemy in the war on terror—and reassure Americans who will soon head to the polls. Other Republicans—including Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum, who is in a tough re-election race—have adopted "Islamofascism" as shorthand for terrorists. The term gained currency in the early '90s in reference to radical Muslim clerics, and was popularized after 9/11 by neocons.

Bush has used the term "Islamic fascists" sporadically, most recently to describe the alleged London bomb plotters last month. But the phrase was noticeably absent from his latest major speech on the war last week—which was part of a procession of campaign-style addresses by the administration's biggest names. This time he called the bad guys "a worldwide network of radicals that use terror to kill those who stand in the way of their totalitarian ideology." It was hardly the kind of pithy slogan GOP activists could slap on a bumper sticker.

more: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14640535/site/newsweek/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PresidentWar Donating Member (499 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. When will these assholes stop using meaningless terms...
Probably never.

But it is easy to see what sort of tactics they are using, and ol' Josef Goebells would be proud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. I call the bad guys the BFEE
The Bush Family evil empire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well, since no Islamic country has merged the corporate
with the state, "fascist" is out.

You'd think these damned fools would consult a dictionary, but NO-OO-O, they've got to use a name that applies perfectly well to them in every sense of the term and paste it onto people they don't like so maybe we'll forget who it really belongs to.

This is even clumsier and more transparent than the usual feces flinging.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azygous Donating Member (110 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. Recently published dictionaries
leave out any reference to corporatism. They define fascism as being related to dictatorships and totalinarianism. Big corporations, publishing industry especially, are busy redefining our language to suit their purposes. I noticed this while standing in line today at the market and paging through the dictionaries they had on a rack by the checkout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. i remember many time Bush calling them "Folks" and then bigfoot tells
him to stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. How can Islamofascism be shorthand for Terrorists....
Six syllables vs. Three....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentWar Donating Member (499 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. "Islamofascism" isn't even a proper WORD
thats what we need to stay focused on. Educate the public as to why. These rethug assholes are ALWAYS playing games with the language to mischaractize for their benefit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. yall should just call em JeeHaaadistists.. it calls the pigs in for me.!!.
Edited on Sat Sep-02-06 09:23 PM by sam sarrha
the english ended the suicide jehadists in india at the turn of the century by sewing up their bodies in fresh skinned out hog hides and buried them in an undisclosed location, denying them all the virgins and entrance into heaven. we could embalm them with the rancid piss of crack whores.. if no hogs are available..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentWar Donating Member (499 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Actually, no
Jihaad, according to the Holy Qur'an, is not supposed to be a political insurrection. It is only to be entered into when you or your community of faith are being attacked. And, there are several forms of it too - not all physical. Someone can be making jihaad by making a public speech.

Don't let the Rethugs be your dictionary, please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. you are right..this isn't as easy as i thought...narcisstic islamo deviants
thank you for being nice about it...

the process aparently started in the 20's in Egypt with the 'islamic brotherhood'

how about.. Islomo-Bro's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. I am a patriotic American and I know what to call the bad guys
- Members of the republican party
- Religiously insane bastards who have no use for our constitution who proclaim themselves "Christians"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. on AAR they were talking about a book, 'end of religion' or NeuroReligion
Edited on Sat Sep-02-06 09:28 PM by sam sarrha
.. they said it was wonderful.. they said by the time you get through the book you feel you were a lunatic for believing in religion..not just the Islo-jehadists

i am going to go to the WhiteRoseSociety.com and get the specifics, i didn't have time to listen to it all..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
12. Why'd they scrap "evildoers"? It had such a nice ring to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
13. George Bush's allies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Yep
The neocons like to use rw religous extremists as tools to acheive their goals. It doesn't matter what religion it is, as long as they are rw nutty authoritarians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC