Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Will we ever have a first lady that holds a job?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 05:59 PM
Original message
Poll question: Will we ever have a first lady that holds a job?
Edited on Sun Sep-03-06 06:00 PM by RGBolen
While her husband is in office.

Asking only about first ladies, we can just assume that our society would not expect a first gentleman to give up his job for his "duties" as first gentleman.

How long?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nope. They don't need the money.
And if they did, they'd scribble in a pay raise somewhere...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Hardly about need

My wife and I could live easily off either of just one of our incomes. If I only worked for what I needed I would stop working at some point of the year, month or week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. conflict of interest/influence peddling
Edited on Sun Sep-03-06 06:05 PM by pitohui
we don't need to encourage spouses of any gender to be holding "jobs" which are in reality just another way to funnel $$$ to rich families


if your wife or husband or family pet is president, your job should be support NOT having your own "job" and raking it in hand over fist because of your actual or perceived ability to divert funds to your company

the presidency pays enough for an honest family to live on, it only doesn't pay enough for a greedy/dishonest family to live on


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Well, Lynne Cheney kept her job--didn't stop her
She toddled off to the HERITAGE FOUNDATION every day.

And I wouldn't have expected Mrs. Howard Dean to give up her job had Howard gone all the way. Why should she? She has a vibrant practice and people who rely on her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. yeah, but so what? "Conflict of interest" obviously means nothing
to the Cheneys
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. There was little outrage over it, that's the point
The spouses aren't on the ballot. They shouldn't be in the damn equation at all. It's government, not a soap opera.

I await the day when First "Spouse" (Lady/Gentleman) is a quaint old term that has fallen out of regular use, like collar stays or watch fobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. there was little outrage because it was the Cheneys
if it was a Dem, I can assure you that there would be outrage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Well, she broke the mold, and no one dare bitch now, dare they? NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. ok here's the deal lynn cheney IS influence peddling
and a job as a doctor is a special case, mrs. dean (she doesn't call herself mrs. dean actuially) is not in position to influence peddle

but corporate and foundation jobs, that's pretty much selling yourself and influence peddling if your spouse/child/daddy/cat holds high office

lynne cheney is a criminal as are all the cheneys

that's not an example i want followed, i want honesty restored to the office
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #16
27. The point is, it should not matter. At all.
Everyone knew what her job was, before the election. And hate her, or her job, or not, it wasn't a secret.

It shouldn't matter if the spouse is a car salesman or a teacher or an underwater basket weaver. If they want to keep their job, they should be able to. We have no right or authority to dictate duties to, or proscribe activities of, unelected relatives of elected officals.

We don't vote for the First Spouse. OR the Second one. They have the same rights as any other citizen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. Being the president's wife is a full time job.
No one could pursue a separate profession in addition to the duties of the president's wife. She represents the American people at diplomatic, cultural, humanitarian and other events in addition to advising and supporting the president. When we have a female president, her husband probably won't be able to have his separate job either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Those duties do not have to be fulfilled

That is a choice by the spouse of the President as to what they do. And if the President does not have a spouse the country doesn't grind to a halt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. No, it isn't. Bess Truman used to stay back home all the time
leaving Harry alone in the WH. She hated the joint, hated the social life, and skipped out ALOT. And when she was in DC, she'd drag her girlfriends with her, they'd drink cocktails and play cards.

The Eleanor Roosevelt model has made it tough for others. But it's a paradigm that could shift, with the right President and spouse. It'll probably take a pissed-off First Husband calling the press a bunch of gossipy assholes to get future First Ladies and Husbands off the hook.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
6. I think it's coming
Edited on Sun Sep-03-06 06:12 PM by LeftyMom
Howard Dean's wife continued practicing throughout her husband's presidential canidacy and it was almost a non-issue.

I'm guessing the initial first lady working independent of her husband's political organization will be somebody who has a non-profit job or something, not somebody who's a corporate lawyer or lobbyist or something that creates conflict of interest
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Her name is Dr. Steinberg, not Dean n/t
Edited on Sun Sep-03-06 06:10 PM by RGBolen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Come to think of it, I believe you're right
Though the fact that I haven't the feintest clue what her name is kinda illustrates what a huge stinking media circus campaign issue it was, eh? I seem to recall somebody in the media tried to draw attention to it and nobody cared.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. her name is officially Dean, but she uses her maiden name
when it comes to her medical practice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. She's Judy Dean socially, Dr. Steinberg professionally
Like attorney Hillary Rodham.

It's the name on the sheepskin that rules the day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. first lady usually has influence they want to take advantage of
Hillary did a lot of work as first lady though not a "regular job" such as if she had continued to practice law.

sadly, in Laura Bush's case she does nothing but prop up the administration with her phony media whore enhanced image. she does photo ops just like the Chimp. like when Katrina victims were told to pose and look happy when she came by.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
14. We will if "she"'s a first gentleman. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tandot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
17. She'd have secret service agents following her everywhere
to make sure that nothing would happen to her. How can your work efficiently when you are so restricted on where to go and always have secret service around?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. No kidding. What's she gonna do, run to the supermarket on the way home
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. They're pretty good. Not always intrusive.
Hell, you'd see the Gores all over DC, on foot, if you kept your eyes peeled. They'd dress unobtrusively, and you wouldn't even notice unless you were a type who looked at faces. I used to see Barbara Bush here and there, too, going for walks, actually. They're close, but not too close to be obnoxious. If you tried to pounce on them, I imagine you'd get pounced on.

Of course, now that Nahn Wun Wun has changed ever'thang, the whole detail could be a bit more onerous. It helps if it's an unannounced kind of thing when they are out and about.

Of course, if you worked in a regular office, they go and get set up, they do their sweeps, and they do the whole protection gig, just as they do for children in colleges.

Hillary had a full detail when she first went to the Senate, because of all the crap she caught from jerks. I don't know if she still has a full detail, or just a partial one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynthia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
19. Some people actually work for other reasons than to bring home the bacon
Like Howard Dean's wife, there might be a first lady (gentleman) who has a profession (vocation) that she does because there is a need for her talents and skills and she enjoys doing it. I work at my job because I am good at it, they need me, and I enjoy doing it. If I won the lottery (which won't happen because I don't buy tickets), I wouldn't quit my job.

I predict that it won't be long before we have a first lady who is actually fulfilled in her profession, yet supports her spouse in his. She keeps her job AND shows up looking pretty for the state dinners. I'll bet most of the rest of the stuff that takes up the first lady's time is fluff and would be put on a shelf in a second if there was a first gentleman!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
21. lets focus first on getting a PRESIDENT who works while in the WH
how can you expect Laura to do a God damned thing when her lazy fucking husband, the president, for Chrissakes, won't even do his job?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentWar Donating Member (499 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
23. As long as it's not Condasleeza Reich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. As First Lady? Or as Pretzledunce??
She doesn't have a spouse....!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kailassa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. But Bush is her husband .... at least, she once said he was ...
And he once said something about being first lady. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kailassa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
29. Yes, when Presidents are paid what they are worth.
Then any republican first lady will have to work to pay the bills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
30. Been reading Clancey again?
This would be a secret service nightmare check out _Presidential_Orders_.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Who?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #31
39. Tom Clancy.
Mispelled is name and got the title wrong.

Ececutive Orders but read Debt of Honor first it will make more sense.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
32. Not while they need Secret Service agents around 24/7.
Just not practical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
33. Didn't Hillary Clinton hold a job - in a way?
I mean, at least her days weren't all about tea and cookies.

But, a 9-to-5 job unrelated to the Presidency? Doubtful. At least not for a while - it would be too much of a lightening rod!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. So did Eleanor Roosevelt as much as she was able to, she
wrote articles for the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. Excellent point! Yes, she was the first to have a mind & voice of her own
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
34. We might have with Howard Dean.
His doctor wife had no intention of giving up her practice to be First Lady. Somehow I think even with a full time job she probably would have done more as First Lady that the do nothing cow that is now enthroned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #34
37. It's funny you mentioned her -
as I was writing my earlier post I was thinking that the only career that wouldn't be a lightening rod would be a doctor - I mean, how can you criticize someone who's helping the sick and doesn't want to give that up??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
38. Hillary Clinton was a senator for a few weeks as First Lady
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC