If you read no other blog post this week...

[BlueIris]

Hook yourself up with the latest from Cannonfire:

http://cannonfire.blogspot.com/2006/09/terror-ten-years-ago.html

It's AWESOME. Particularly for those of us who know the truth about the Clinton Administration and its role in actually, you know, protecting us from terrorism, despite what conservatives may now try to claim.

(While you're there, by the way, consider throwing a couple of donations Joe's way; he's more than earned them by now, I think.)

[TheFriedPiper]

1. You mean CONservatives are hypocrites!?!?! You don't say!!!

:sarcasm:

[BlueIris]

3. There's a better examination of the hypocrisy WRT terrorism in that post

than I've seen in most places. It goes even farther than I would have thought to take it. I mean, who remembers what these fuckwads were claiming about Clinton in '96? I didn't, but Joseph was kind enough, as usual, to go pull some of their ole' blatherings for his readers. That's the mark of a conscientious journalist, I tell ya. That entry is gold, for its frightening specificity and its originality.

[Pierre.Suave]

2. Disgusting

is all I can say. Forward this to every candidate facing a republican in an election that was on office at the time.

[BlueIris]

4. That's what I say!

No, seriously, that's what I'm trying to do. Sorta why I posted it on this site. :-)

[BlueIris]

5. Kick. Doesn't anyone else appreciate Joe's awesome post?

:-(

[BlueIris]

6. Okay, come on. The art there right now is GREAT.

Best you'll see allll week, I bet.

[annabanana]

7. k&r. . . . n/t

[BlueIris]

8. Hee. That's more like it.

:-)

[BlueIris]

9. But...but...the art at Cannonfire right now would make a KILLER icon.

In fact...I may have to go snag it later.

[BlueIris]

10. Or...would it? Could someone actually use that as an avatar here?

Or would you get in trouble for violating the rules?

Sigh. Oh, well.

[BlueIris]

11. Kick. It's still great.

[BlooInBloo]

12. It WOULD be awesome - if links were provided....

... without links to the google groups posts, it's notihng more than making shit up (evidence-wise).

Gotta have the links.

[BlueIris]

13. Clearly, you're not familiar with the author.

Sigh. He has an archives section, you know.

[BlooInBloo]

15. I have no idea what you're talking about....

... I just want links when someone claims to have gotten something off the internet. Else it's just makin up shit - from an evidenciary perspective.

Sigh.


EDIT: I'm sorry that strikes you as an onerous burden. I'm also sorry that I'm not the sory of person who accepts things simply because I'm "familiar with the author". You rock on with that, though.

[blm]

14. Great collection of quotes

.

[cannonfire]

16. links

Folks, if you really want the links, I supppose I can re-post the thing over the week-end. (They were supposed to appear at BradBlog, but I didn't get to it in time.)

But if you really really REALLY want the source material right now, you can get them by going through the same motions that I used to find that stuff, and that I will have to use to find that stuff. Fire up Google. Go to Groups. Go to Advanced. Restrict the dates to the period between January 1, 1996 and December 31, 1996. Search on the terms CLINTON TERROR. You may want to try CLINTON TERROR CONSPIRACY or CLINTON TERROR RIGHTS. If you are looking for where a specific quote in my piece came from, drop in a sentence or two within quotes.

I am not the fellow who put together the, uh, art at the top of the page at this writing. I just thought that such a fine effort deserved wider exposure.