Time Mag. article about 9/11 conspiracy theories not bad--conclusion sucks
European Socialist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-05-06 08:07 PM
Original message |
Time Mag. article about 9/11 conspiracy theories not bad--conclusion sucks |
|
Edited on Tue Sep-05-06 08:20 PM by michigander3
Apparently we just can't handle(like JFK assassination)the fact that such a major event could be pulled off by ordinary means--so we have to make up a grand scheme to ease our tormented souls. Time doesn't even mention all the lies and stonewalling that we have heard over the years. McPravda strikes again.
|
John Q. Citizen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-05-06 08:34 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Yeah, why is Oswald acting alone not grand answer but if evidence |
|
shows he isn't actng alone it's a grand answer? That's stupid.
Hasn't the reporter ever read the House Committee on Assassination's Report?
Why doesn't the reporter do a piece on why the media won't investigate why devoutly religious suicide bombers would be drinking, gamboling and hanging out at strip clubs?
Why doesn't the reporter investigate why America had no air defense on 9/11 for at least an hour and a half?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:54 AM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.