Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Croc hunter" was powerful voice for conservation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 09:00 PM
Original message
"Croc hunter" was powerful voice for conservation

http://reuters.excite.com/article/20060905/2006-09-05T211525Z_01_N05366535_RTRIDST_0_ENTERTAINMENT-AUSTRALIA-IRWIN-CONSERVATION-DC.html

"Croc hunter" was powerful voice for conservation
Email this Story

Sep 5, 5:15 PM (ET)

By Deborah Zabarenko, Environment Correspondent

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - With his trademark cry of "Crikey!" and his ebullient persona, television naturalist Steve Irwin was an atypical but powerful voice for animal conservation, wildlife experts said on Tuesday.

Irwin, known to viewers as the "Crocodile Hunter," died on Monday after a stingray's serrated barb pierced his heart while he was filming at the Great Barrier Reef off Australia.

His talents as an entertainer served the conservationists' cause well, said M. Sanjayan, lead scientist for The Nature Conservancy.

"I absolutely think he counts as a naturalist and he counts as a conservationist," Sanjayan said in a telephone interview. "And people who tell you otherwise are just simply jealous of the success he's had."

Sanjayan said most professional conservationists appreciate those like Irwin who "charismatically bring conservation to life," but he questioned whether raising public awareness is enough to make any measurable difference to wild animals and their habitat.

Irwin's animal programs often featured the "Crocodile Hunter" wrestling snakes or crocodiles, but also offered messages about saving the natural environment where such creatures live.


Australia's "Crocodile Hunter" Steve Irwin holds a pure bred Sumatran tiger cub at Mogo Zoo, south of Sydney in this April 27, 2004 file photo. Fatally injured Irwin pulled a stingray's serrated barb from his chest before he lost consciousness and died, his manager said Tuesday as fans worldwide mourned the exuberant naturalist. REUTERS/Will Burgess/Files


His approach was different from more traditional wildlife documentaries, which kept filmmakers and observers at a safe distance without close interaction with animals.

ROUGH-HEWN AND WATCHABLE

Ginette Hemley, vice president for conservation at World Wildlife Fund, praised Irwin for popularizing the notion of protecting animals even as he wrestled with them onscreen.

Irwin was the antithesis of the mild-mannered natural scientist, quietly doing field work, Hemley said by telephone.

"He certainly was rough-hewn. He was a larger-than-life personality. ... He was eminently watchable," Hemley said. "For that reason I think he only helped advance the cause that we're committed to, which is conservation."

She agreed with Sanjayan that Irwin's conservation impact would to difficult to measure, but Hemley was gratified that television viewers tuned in to the "Crocodile Hunter" rather than programs unconcerned with protecting wildlife.

Rod Mast, a marine biologist and vice president of the environmental group Conservation International, said Irwin's prime conservation role was to influence people.

"The real issue in conservation is changing human attitudes about nature and human behaviors in relation to nature, and one of the things he did superbly was to make wildlife cool," Mast said.

Sanjayan said he feared Irwin's legacy might be numerous copycat programs like the "Crocodile Hunter," but Mast said even these could have positive effects. "I don't have a problem with that," Mast said. "The more wildlife you see on TV, the more people get excited about wildlife."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nature Conservancy? World Wildlife Fund?
I'd never lend praise to a pro-hunting group. Conservation is more than shooting-and-killing, oft called "hunting" by those that partake.

I appreciate the praise these groups give, but they besmirch the name and the good he tried to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC