Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Couric's new show "oddly lacking in news" -WP

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 06:54 AM
Original message
Couric's new show "oddly lacking in news" -WP
Edited on Wed Sep-06-06 06:56 AM by onehandle
Mission accomplished. Journalism is dead-er.

The WP also supplies a photo gallery, because that's what her hiring was all about.
________________________________________

Couric's Debut Not Newsworthy - from front page.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/05/AR2006090501473.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why point out the obvious? It usually is with her. It's either
meaningless crap or slanted partisan bubble-headed crap. Either way, if it's Couric you know that you're gonna get crap.

Which is why I don't watch her. Ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kiouni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. the 24 hour news plan
was flawless dammit what happened?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. I miss Peter Jennings.
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crankie Avalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
4. No photos showing off her bare legs??? This isn't up to her usual...
...journalistic standards. :spank:



Why is she sitting at a desk like some old Walter Kronkite-type fuddy duddy? Didn't she say she wants to change the image of "the news"? Why isn't she naked on a bearskin rug winking at the camera? But belly down so we don't see her your-know-whatzis's--after all, we only want to freshen up how news is presented, not make a mockery of its gravitas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. LMFAO, Crank!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #4
25. "Not make a mockery of its gravitas"
Ooo, good one! I can smell the sarcasm all the way over here. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varkam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
5. Truer words have never been written...
In fact, if Murrow were going to spin in his grave, he would have started long ago, when "infotainment" first appeared on the TV horizon and newscasters became pop personalities akin to movie stars and actors appearing in sitcoms. Murrow must be all spun out by now. It's been downhill for a long time.

So true. So unfortunately true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
6. Shocked! I am Shocked!...
As Dan Rather put it "The tarting up of the news."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pimpbot Donating Member (770 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 07:09 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. If you want to catch Dan Rather, hes on HDNet in October
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MessiahRp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 07:23 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. Can you watch him if you don't have HD?
I have DirecTV and don't even know if this channel is on the system.

Rp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #15
22. I was wondering the same thing
Edited on Wed Sep-06-06 08:05 AM by Warpy
Rather on his own show without a bunch of corporate suits breathing down the back of his neck might be watchable. He was once a fine journalist. I'm sure he could sharpen back up quickly.

The review in the WP made me glad I'd tuned into an old movie last night instead of watching more tabloid fluff and partisan crap parading as news, while the real news is ignored.

Couric will continue to get slammed for it, but all the networks have been doing it for a very long time. She's the symptom. The disease goes far deeper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
7. Sounds like opening night..
.. left continents and continents of room for improvement
for cute and perky Katie.

Just another avoid show for me....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
9. Come on, the pictures of Tom Cruise & Katie Holmes' baby
were not just a fluff piece. It was a major fluff piece.

I watched ...... not going to make a point of it again ..... the first piece on Afghanistan
done by Lara Logan was great, then the piece w/ little lord Bunny Pants talking about
staying the course in Iraq was O.K. except for the film of Hitler & Stalin speaking as
* spoke that bin Laden was the same as those 2 was highly manipulative ...... then
something on an oil find in the Gulf of Mexico was O.K. ...... but after that the show
was pure news-O-tainment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #9
26. Tom & Katie's baby? Come ON!
You have got to be kidding!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
10. wait just one second here! "Liberal Columnist Tom Friedman"????
<snip>

Last night, the show simply played to her strengths, chiefly her ability as an interviewer. She had a taped sit-down with liberal columnist Thomas Friedman of the New York Times, who seemed to be trying too hard to "come across" on television, as if he'd just completed TV training.

Give Me A Fucking Break! :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Thanks.
I had the same reaction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 07:21 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Oh, I get it. Neocon = Liberal. Liberal is anyone to the left of
Attila the Hun...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #10
18. Tomorrow is moderate conservative Rush Limbaugh
They're still trying to slot in moderate Tim McVeigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #10
27. I turned the show off half way through his screed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
14. After giving it a night's rest, I have a more upbeat appraisal of
Katie's performance. Given a little more work, she may be able to turn her program into another Entertainment Tonight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
16. I didn't see the whole thing (taped it) but it was an interesting take...
on a news show. The normal 60-90 seconds of news coverage (complete with reporter outside of the White House or in the halls of Congress) is passed over for a more complete discussion of an issue.

It also reminded me quite a bit of the BBC/Lehrer approach to a news coverage in that there were interviews in the midst of the show not just news reports.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grytpype Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
17. There's a ton of war news to talk about?
How can she have a news-free show when there's a war going on with new horrible revelations every day?

"Slow news day" my ass!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalpress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. Not for nothin' ...
... but have any of you ever tried to compile so much as a five-minute radio newscast the day after a major holiday? Reporters and editorss have just had a three day weekend. Try it sometime and get back with me. I'll be reading hog futures to fill the time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
19. Ruination of CBS News Department is now complete.
As was intended.

Olbermann is pretty much all that is left (And even he makes use of blatant bias and tabloid elements, which, within the current context of TV news, is necessary).

Considering that the TRUTH is no longer important this should be horrifying to American citizens. But it's not.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
21. Nightline is the same now...no news, just chatter
I sorta liked the new format at first, but it's turning into all happy talk. I'm going to stop watching...it's just not worth the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
23. I switched to PBS last night. The first time in 45 years I didn't watch
CBS Evening News.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GCP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. And I bet you got a lot more news from them
Even in their news summary at the beginning of the show they actually (gasp) show more news than the other 3 networks' total news coverage combined - once you take out the hemmorhoid ads and "Eye On America" type-crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LTR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #23
28. The News Hour with Jim Lehrer is excellent
Much better than the network crap. It's real news.

My local PBS station follows it with "BBC World News".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #23
29. You ought to contact them (email or whatever) and tell them that. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. I told them that when they announced she was taking the job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
31. Bring back Bob Schieffer! nt
Edited on Wed Sep-06-06 10:45 AM by Marie26
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedStateShame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
32. "Oddly?!"
The only thing odd was that the show didn't have traffic and weather on the 2's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC