Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ashcroft “didn’t want to hear of al Qaeda” in high threat summer of 2001

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 10:34 AM
Original message
Ashcroft “didn’t want to hear of al Qaeda” in high threat summer of 2001
From Crooks and Liars

A video reminder of how our Attorney General felt about terrorist threats in the summer of 2001.

Will this tidbit be in ABC's "docudrama"?

<snip>
BEN-VENISTE: And according to the statement that our staff took from you, you said that you would start each meeting discussing either counterterrorism or counterintelligence. At the same time the threat level was going up and was very high. Mr. Watson had come to you and said that the CIA was very concerned that there would be an attack. You said that you told the attorney general this fact repeatedly in these meetings. Is that correct?

PICKARD: I told him at least on two occasions.

BEN-VENISTE: And you told the staff according to this statement that Mr. Ashcroft told you that he did not want to hear about this anymore. Is that correct?

PICKARD: That is correct.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. ashcroft listened enough to quit taking commercial flights n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. see, the problem with that exchange is that it does not talk about
Clinton's penis, which is apparently the reason there is any trouble at all in the world. :eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Ahhh... the mighty Clenis.
Such power it wields.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
4. Asscroft was distracted by the Justice bare breast--too busy trying to
figure out how to cover it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. well, those "Family Values" people sure do know whats important!
Edited on Wed Sep-06-06 10:59 AM by FLDem5
Ugh.
from this:
to this:

http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/valentine.asp
<snip>
After John Ashcroft, the Attorney General during President George W. Bush's first term, was captured by press cameramen in similar shots, the media reported in January 2002 that Ashcroft had ordered (or approved) the Department of Justice's spending of $8,650 for drapes to hide the two statues because he didn't like being photographed in front of them (or, worse, that Ashcroft was a embarrassingly prudish Philistine who was offended by any representation of nudity). Department of Justice spokespersons maintained that the drapes were used not to hide the statues but to "provide a nice background for television cameras" during formal events; that the purchase had been made by a DoJ staffer on her own initiative to save the $2,000 per event cost of renting them; and that "the attorney general was not even aware of the situation." Critics held that the DoJ's disputing the issue of who actually authorized the purchase of the drapes was a smoke screen (since rental drapes were already being used to cover the statues); that the drapes were left hanging all the time and were not put in place only when televised events were being held in the Great Hall; and that even if Attorney General Ashcroft didn't know about or authorize the purchase, he certainly didn't order the drapes removed, either:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberaldemocrat7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. Why? Because his Boss the ChimpenFuhrer was dealing
Edited on Wed Sep-06-06 10:47 AM by liberaldemocrat7
with the Taliban during that period for gas and oil pipelines. The Chimpenfuhrer had invasion plans on the shelf in case the Taliban wouldn't go along. They didn't. Bush pushed and boom, blowback 2 towers and the pentagon exploded.

Now you see why Ashcroft did not want to hear of this.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC