Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who else is creeped out by the use of the word "Chairman"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 12:49 PM
Original message
Who else is creeped out by the use of the word "Chairman"?
Edited on Wed Sep-06-06 12:59 PM by SoCalDem
Every time I see republicans conducting a love-fest on tv, someone refers to Chairman Frist.. or Speaker Frist

Senator Frist, I can accept...same for Dr. Frist (even though he cheated on his paperwork)..or even Mr. Frist...or even Bill Frist...but

Chariman?? come on.. It's so...well..Red China of them (harkening back to a departed era)..

These are the same freaks who insit on calling the Atty Gen....General (in a militaristic sense), even though the term "general" is meant in a NON-military sense..

and of course the dems are onto it too..just as they did with the "democrat party" stuff.. republicans coin phrases, and instead of fighting it off and calling them out..they started saying "Chairman Pelosi" or "Leader pelosi".

The only people who even give a rip, already KNOW these people are in charge...the rest of the people couldn't care less..


This republican menace and theior stranglehold on language is downright dangerous, and I am so longing for them to be gone..

I envision a day (hopefully soon) when the media will no longer cater to them..I hope that we will someday turn on a tv, and see some liberal ideas...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. What about the many DU'ers who say "Chairman Dean"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. That's creepier, since we should know better
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. Er, it probably reminds you of Chairman Mao.n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm looking forward to Chairman Conyers, Chairman Frank, etc etc
Doesn't bother me in the slightest...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I do not object to the TITLE, just the constant usage of the apellation
Like I said, the people who are "in the know", already know what these folks do for their job, and the rest of the people out there don't care , and probably could not pick any of them out of a line-up..

It's an awkward sounding thing.. Like introducing your boss, as "section-leader, Al"..:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Actually, the proper appellation is "Mr. Chairman"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. General Ashcroft
I recall when they started calling him that - it was so ridiculous, comical even. No one had ever called an AG by that honorific in recent history.

Where is Ashcroft these days? Working as a highly paid lobbyist I assume.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. It weirds me out, too.
It's somehow related to the fact that these people have to keep impressing themselves and others that they're in charge. It goes hand-in-hand with ignoring all the information handed over to them by the Clinton people.

A related behavior that some of the Democrats have also engaged in: writing torrid novels about a super-Congressman or super-Senator who somehow saves the country from a mad conspiracy a la Tom Clancy. Here these people are in some of the most important jobs in the world and they seem to spend their time engaging in Walter Mitty fantasies!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
datadiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
8. I know this is about Frist
but the repubs have been using the Commander in Chief title rather frequently of late. I hate when they do that. He's not my Commander in Chief. They've been using a lot of these titles lately. They think it makes them look strong. Problem is it just makes him look more ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. He is not as Chertoffian lately. Looks like he's put on weight.
He used to look like a painted cadaver, but today his face looked plumped.. Like a ballpark frank..:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Being President isn't good enough for George.
Edited on Wed Sep-06-06 02:00 PM by hedgehog
I think Commander-in-Chief was originally meant to indicate that the President was ultimately responsible for determining strategy and tactics either directly or though his appointed officers. In other words, Congress couldn't interfere directly in the disposition of troops, etc. The way the title of Commander in Chief has been distorted to by-pass the need for a declaration of War is tearing this country apart. I can't blame the Republicans alone for this. Democratic Presidents have also sent the troops into battle with little or no permission.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. Those are officially earned titles.
Sorry, but those are NEVER going away, nor did they start with the Bush administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cobalt-60 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
11. perhaps "The Chairman"
A nice cold war piece featuring Gregory Peck?
Don't let it creep you out, it's just a title.
Chancellor, now that one gives me a chill...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
12. Chairman Mao
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
15. Chairman of the Board??


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC