Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So America was born through war

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 08:37 AM
Original message
So America was born through war
Doesn't it have to die through war as well? Yeah, yeah, yeah, we're anti-war. But we wouldn't even have a country without it. We wouldn't have one ounce of our standard of living without it. Everything we enjoy today is because of war.

Is Europe an example to follow? Haven't they learned to live without war? I would say that if our military didn't take care of what it takes care of(the flow of oil to the 1st/developed/industrial/whatever world), European countries would spend more tax money on their respective armies instead of social programs.

Oh yeah, cheap energy is the only reason we no longer have overt slavery...in this country.

Why aren't we thanking the military-industrial-energy-complex? We wouldn't have progress without it.

Too ridiculous? Too truthy(ahhh, Colbert)? Too naive? Too neanderthalish(even though they never did get to drop a nuclear bomb on anyone)? Too cynical? Too stupid to even respond to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. There are wars that are necessary to fight then there are aggressions
The act bu$h refers to as a war is nothing more than an act of aggression. One nation exerting it's force on another. And the War on terror is NOT! How can you have a war on ideals, The problem with calling it a war on terror is that when you capture one terrorist, you usually create two or more new ones through the aggressions used to capture the first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. It's just unfortunate about the millions of people we killed.
After all, life is just about improving our standard of living at whatever cost to anyone else.

Why, if we hadn't conquered half the world, and slaughtered millions, for our benefit, we wouldn't have iPods or cell-phones or hair-restorer.

The Romans and the Brits did much the same to improve their standard of living. Now it's our turn to face the consequences of our mindless greed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enigma000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. I'm not sure America is a product of war
For most of American history, the military machine was not especially active. There were border disputes: War of 1812. Campaigns of expansion: Mexican War, Indian Wars. The big one was a war of unity: the Civil War.

Americans put their energies into building a continent wide nation. It has been said that in 1940 you could go from one end of the country to another and never see a serviceman on your entire trip.

But then the world changed. The US was dragged into WWII. Abandoning Western Europe in the late 1940s probably would have led to Soviet rule there. We would be having this conversation in Russian.

Europe has learned to live without war, but many people in other lands have not. And responsible world powers have to acknowledge this unhappy point.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lectrobyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. You might want to revisit the period between the end of the Civil
War and 1940... The empire was growing. Gunboat diplomacy. South American adventures. The Philippines. Remember the Maine!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enigma000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. That's very true - at the beginning of the 20th century
the US started to exert a growing influence beyond its borders. (mind you, it did do it to a lesser extent in the 19th century)

The US was the regional power. It even picked up some colonies: Cuba, Philippines, the Panama Canal Zone. Still, it wasn't like it was run like the Belgium Congo..........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC