Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

They Army shuns system that can save lives.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
sandrakae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 10:49 AM
Original message
They Army shuns system that can save lives.
The Army shuns system to combat RPGs. The Israeli's have a system called Trophy they can combat RPG's and save lives. Instead of our Government using this, they have decided to give a 70 million dollar contract to Raytheon to develop a new system. Raytheon’s system won’t be ready for fielding until 2011 at the earliest. In the mean time our troops are dying.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14686871/

Please write your congressman. Express your outrage.

http://www.congress.org/congressorg/home/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. Jesus Christ on a bike, it's like PENTAGON WARS, only worse!!!!
Kotchman, however, says the Army is doing everything prudent to provide for the protection and safety of U.S. forces and insists the Israeli system is not ready to be deployed by the U.S. “Trophy has not demonstrated its capability to be successfully integrated into a system and continue to perform its wartime mission,” he says.

That claim, however, is disputed by other Pentagon officials as well as internal documents obtained by NBC News. In an e-mail, a senior official writes: “Trophy is a system that is ready — today... We need to get this capability into the hands of our warfighters ASAP because: (1) It will save lives!”

Officials also tell NBC News that according to the Pentagon’s own method of measuring a weapons system’s readiness, Trophy is “between a 7 and an 8” out of a possible score of 9. Raytheon’s system is said to be a “3.”

So why would the Army block a solution that might help troops?

“There are some in the Army who would be extremely concerned that if the Trophy system worked, then the Army would have no need to go forward with the Raytheon system and the program might be terminated,” says Steven Schooner, who teaches procurement law at both George Washington University and the Army’s Judge Advocate General’s School....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countryjake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. This week I saw a Stryker mom whose son was killed by an RPG...
and she was pleading with people to bring this to the attention of all those who "support the troops". I've been searching for that news report, but I can't remember what local network it was on, all I know is that her son was from the Stryker Brigade out of Ft. Lewis, WA.

This is taking "war profiteering" to a whole new level, turning down protection that is proven in favor of stuffing Raytheon's pockets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostInAnomie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. I saw that report the other day.
There is a corrupt deal going on somewhere along the line. Raytheon won't be ready until 2011 when they others are up and running and 98% success rates right now. Raytheon didn't have to go through the testing process when the others did, and when they were tested they only had to do the easiest test. Raytheon employees made up the majority of the judges on the panel also.

Something very corrupt is going on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC