Who holds the copyright to the 9/11 Commission Report?

[KamaAina]

I assume it's some arm of Bush**co, in which case my brilliant plan is foiled yet again, but if it were a real copyright holder, wouldn't they object strenuously, as in with pit-bull lawyers, to this thinly disguised propaganda film "The Path to 9/11" billing itself as "based on the 9/11 Comission Report"? I sure as hell would! :grr:

[katty]

1. copyright should be held by U.S. citizens, they PAID for it

however, you can contact your local ACLU-they can check it for you.

[MADem]

2. It is a US government publication, anyone can grab it NT

[KamaAina]

3. Very well, then. I shall write the most salacious novel imaginable

and claim that it is "based on the Congressional Record". :P

[MADem]

5. Make sure you have plenty of Wilbur Mills/Fanne Fox style scenes in there

Oh, and don't forget Man on Dog Santorum...surely there's a chapter or two in there!

[EST]

4. Based on the KO report, last night, it appears that the dem

members of the commission are, indeed, objecting to this slur and slander, while the clowns are maintaining that it's a fair representation.
I should think that Bill Clinton and Al Gore, both currently non-politicians, will have grounds for a humongous law suit and wind up owning abc.

I can well remember the wails and gnashing of teeth at the prospect of their demi-god's, ronny the magnificent's, appearance in a far more realistic info-fiction, not long ago. One of their main objections,iirc, was that a tell-all should not be shown while the perpetrator is still alive.
Of course, that description for raygun was questionable.

The double standard is alive and well.
I suspect the experience we, as liberals, are going through, always wrong, always at fault, even when the situation is near identical, always cast in a negative light, can be a lesson in learning a slight taste of what it was like (and still is, to a great degree) to live in a skin not of the approved color.