Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Katrina Emergency Declaration: New Orleans exempted... anyone remember?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Brotherjohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 02:07 PM
Original message
Katrina Emergency Declaration: New Orleans exempted... anyone remember?
I'm reading Ivor Van Heerden's excellent book "The Storm", and he mentions something I remember hashing out here on DU once. Brownie and others once made the claim that New Orleans was exempted from the State of Emergency declared by Bush on Sat, Aug. 27th (retroactive to Aug. 26).

Now, if one looks at the White House declaration, if DOES NOT in fact include New Orleans. (http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/08/20050827-1.html) It lists a series of parishes covered and curiously, Orleans, Jefferson, Plaquemines, St. Bernard... in fact, NO coastal parishes are listed!

I thought this was odd at the time, and I remember someone posting that the reason (besides conspiracy theory) was something to the effect of FEMA not being legally allowed to position assets/resources in flooded areas / within the disaster area (but NOT being unable to help there).

Anyone familiar w/ the reasoning?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Heard this on Randi Rhodes also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. Not declaring the coastal areas under a State of Emergency is BS
has it ever happened before? Why now? Just another coincidence?

BushCo really seems to thrive on coincidence, if that is the case. It's what they've based their entire narrative on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. They claimed that at the time
I do believe it was disproved. We need to look at what Blanco wrote, but what the douphouses in DC say she wrote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yes...
it's called Bullshit or CYA depending on your point-of-view.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC