Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush wants to pass law that says he's not breaking the law (Wiretapping)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 09:06 PM
Original message
Bush wants to pass law that says he's not breaking the law (Wiretapping)
Edited on Thu Sep-07-06 09:07 PM by Texas Explorer
Another example of how shrub wants to rewrite the laws he's broken so that he hasn't really broken them.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/07/AR2006090700837.html


President Bush urged Congress today to give him "additional authority" to carry out a controversial warrantless eavesdropping program directed against international terrorists and to approve "broader reforms" in the 1978 law that regulates domestic surveillance of foreign agents' communications.

<snip>

Despite Bush's call for congressional action to strengthen the legal underpinnings of the eavesdropping program, the Senate Judiciary Committee today delayed action on such a bill after a Democratic senator, Russell D. Feingold of Wisconsin, spoke against it at length and offered four amendments.

<snip>

In the Senate, however, Judiciary Committee Chairman Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) called off a vote on a bill he had negotiated with the administration. Among other provisions, the bill would submit the NSA surveillance program to the FISA court for a one-time constitutional review and would lengthen the duration of emergency surveillance before obtaining a FISA warrant from three days to seven days.

Specter blamed what he called election-year "obstructionism" for the delay in sending his bill to the Senate floor.

"We have seen the incipient stage of filibuster by amendment," he said as he called off the committee vote on the measure, the Associated Press reported.

In opposing the bill on grounds it would give the White House too much power to carry out warrantless eavesdropping, Feingold told the panel, "The president has basically said: "I'll agree to let a court decide if I'm breaking the law if you pass a law first that says I'm not breaking the law." Feingold added, "That won't help reestablish a healthy respect for separation of powers. It will only make matters worse."


Go Russ!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lefty48197 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why doesn't he just pardon himself?
Who needs a Congress anyways?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. This Cover-up-Congress FAILS to provide oversight, they are
as guilty as he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefty48197 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. That might be a good campaign theme: Failure to oversee Bush
Sounds like High Treason to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Sounds like High Treason to me too. Yes, the GOP Culture of
Corruption and the Cover-up-Congress complicit in the crimes of the * Administration IMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. For those of you who still don't get it,
Edited on Thu Sep-07-06 09:18 PM by BuyingThyme
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. You can't trust anyone with
an R after their name. There are no moderates they would have left the party in shame by now if they weren't a part of the whole mess. There may have been a time for bipartisanship but it isn't now and won't be until they rid themselves of their leadership or dissolve the republican party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why doesn't the little pissant just pass an executive order that
declares him, 'pResident for life"? I am sure a "signing order" will take care of it. :argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anakin Skywalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. Oh What the Fuck?!
Why not just declare himself Intergalactic Emperor and be done with it already, the Son of a Bitch?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kutjara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. Shrub gets more like Silvio Berlusconi every day.
Edited on Thu Sep-07-06 09:14 PM by Kutjara
Wriggling around, trying to get the legislature to pass laws legalizing his crimes, grasping new privileges and immunities wherever he can, pretending his crimes are legal because of his position. Just another puffed-up powermonger, looking for ever purer fixes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC