Is "Path to 911" a rebuttal to the documentary

[tsuki]

that Spike Lee produced?

Just asking. It seems that the RNC is desperate to direct attention from "When the Levees Broke: A Requiem in Four Acts" to terra, terra, terra, IT'S THE CLENIS FAULT."

[NYCGirl]

1. I think it's been filming for quite a while — it couldn't be a rebuttal.

[tsuki]

2. Spike Lee's documentary was in production for quite a while. They

knew it would be released before the election. Why would the RNC not look for a distraction?

[NYCGirl]

4. Maybe it's just a big steaming pile of propaganda — and not a rebuttal

to anything.

Besides, this whole mess started too late to take attention off Lee's film — that started showing a couple of weeks ago. If it was a distraction, their timing was off.

[tsuki]

7. It is a steaming pile, I agree. But Spike Lee's documentary was

in the works for a long time. They must have known the impact that it would have. That is why I am wondering if this isn't a film to distract from the failures of Katrina.

[seabeyond]

3. i think after f911 they said, we can do that. and hence the idea born

for 2006. they are just stupid and deceitful and dishonest and dont get that what moore put out really isn't fiction and lie cause they convince themselves of it. so they went all out in the stupidest of ways

[stillcool]

5. It's PR.....and..

it's what they do. Image, message, and crafting reality IS what we used to call 'political debate'. Think tanks, K-Street, focus groups, psychologists....all getting together to sell us a new and improved version of our history.

[Secular Agent Man]

6. This is more like "The Psychopathy After 911" than

a rebuttal to anything. Rightwingers are batshit>:crazy: