Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

JOHN BOLTON CONFIRMATION IS DEAD

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 09:12 AM
Original message
JOHN BOLTON CONFIRMATION IS DEAD
JOHN BOLTON CONFIRMATION IS DEAD
By Steve Clemons

Several well-placed sources close to the Bolton nomination process have reported to me that the Bolton confirmation process is now dead.

The Senate Foreign Relations Committee is "highly unlikely" to reconsider Bolton's confirmation again as things now stand.

One insider reported, as far as the Committee is concerned, "we consider the confirmation over. It's dead."

......................

Senator Lincoln Chafee gets this week's 'Conservative with a Conscience' Award for his principled stand on the importance of America's Middle East diplomacy and for making the Bolton confirmation process an appropriate vehicle to express his concerns.

more at:
http://www.tpmcafe.com/blog/coffeehouse/2006/sep/08/john_bolton_confirmation_is_dead
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. Please let this be true!!!
Edited on Fri Sep-08-06 09:18 AM by Cooley Hurd
:bounce:

Bolton is the epitome of how terribly wrong US foreign policy has become!

K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. TPM shouldn't rewards Chafee
He's just pandering to get re-elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
14. Of course it's an election year move, but it's a pretty damn good one.
But, I think there's more to it. Some "personal" indiscretion that has been bubbling under the radar. Bolton has a history of sexual weaknesses.

BushInc may have needed Chaffee to make this move AND let him use it to win back his seat for his appearance of being tough on Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #14
21. I agree.
It wouldn't make me vote for him for Senate, if I were in RI, but I support his receiving a conservative with conscience award, especially considering it may not be enough to keep him in office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #21
36. Let's see how long his opposition lasts - this really feels like election
strategy, not sincere concern from Chaffee OR Lugar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. It is an election year ploy!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=103x233910

"Chafee is fighting for his political life. Next Tuesday, Rhode Island primary voters must decide between Chafee, the Senate's most liberal Republican, and Cranston Mayor Stephen Laffey, who is challenging him from the right. If Chafee survives the GOP primary, he must then win reelection in one of the most Democratic states in the country....Republican leadership aides said GOP leaders are willing to give Chafee some room to maneuver ahead of Tuesday's primary. But they indicated they will probably push for a vote after the polls close next week."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
38. I'll give him credit regardless of his motivation.
Edited on Fri Sep-08-06 03:48 PM by Vidar
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MallRat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. HOLY SHIT.
Amazing.

It just doesn't make sense... is Chafee digging in his heels? Maybe he feels like he has nothing to lose.

Also note- this wouldn't be possible if the Democratic minority wasn't unified in opposing Bolton. Just one Dem crossing the aisle would've given Bolton the green light. Kudos to our folks on Foreign Relations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. A friend of mine in Indiana said
Lugar made it clear that he wouldn't advance bolton if he didn't get an up vote in committee. They must not have got the votes.

It doesn't matter to bolton -- scrubbie will just appoint him again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. From what I've read,* can't appoint him again. It's a one-shot
deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. He CANNOT appoint him again
If he doesn't get through committee, he's finished at the UN, period.

You can't douible up a recess appointment, as criminal Otto Reich discovered earlier in Bush's tenure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Ummm, read this. We're both wrong.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/05/AR2006090501024.html

snip//

Bush could reappoint him during an upcoming congressional recess, but Bolton could not receive a salary and he would be viewed as being in a weakened position.

snip//
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. Interesting
Knowing Smirky, he'll go for it, but it will take the gloves off entirely about Bolton's conduct. I sort of hope he does it, because Bolton will become the face of the GOP for the rest of Smirk's term. And it's an ugly, intolerant, arrogant, smug, and ignorant face...perfect for our purposes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mahatmakanejeeves Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #15
28. which leaves open the possibility
that * will reappoint Bolton, and that wealthy benefactors will pick up the tab to make up for Bolton's lost salary.

Do you think that wouldn't happen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. I have no doubt dimson will do whatever his little (non)heart
desires, damn the consequences. And yes, someone will pay Bolton's blood money/salary. That'd be a drop in the bucket for Halliburton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #28
34. That would be a massive conflict of interest
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrioticliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #34
41. Think Shrub gives a fuck? Think again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #13
25. My guess: Bush will issue an energency executive order because of
the Warron Terra and go right ahead and reappoint him during recess.

We all know he believes he can do LITERALLY anything he wishes because of the WARRON.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
4. Yeeee-ha! They couldn't possibly find anyone as dangerous as
Bolton for this position. Could they?:dilemma:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Richard Perle
Wolfowitz, Sean Hannity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dulcinea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #8
26. Hannity is such a putz.
And he sucks ass! Imagine that cretin at the UN!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #26
43. I'd almost love to see it
Seeing him everyday shuffling those papers because he was getting his clocked cleaned in a debate and didn't know what to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #8
27. Bolton is worse
Wolfie and Perle at least have a veneer of education and civilization. Bolton is an untrammeled Repuke id, rampaging through a world of perceived enemies, acting like the baboon he is. Sorry to our hairier fellow species.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
5. I guess his next step is to scream and pound on the walls...
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
6. Good riddance. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
10. I guess when Shrub reappoints him during recess he'll go back unpaid
to the UN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
35. Defense Contractor kickbacks keep *'s Walrus on the gravy train
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patricia92243 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
11. Bush does not have the ability to hire good people, so the next one will b
be just as bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #11
29. My thoughts exactly
They dumped Harriet Myers and we get Samuel "Unitary Executive" Alito.

Ashcroft was replaced by Alberto Gonzalez.

Maybe Bush will nominate that general who said that his god was bigger than their god to replace Bolton?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBS Donating Member (12 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
12. This is a good first step
Considering the initial reports when Bolton's nomination was added to the Repug's "to-do" list, this is a great sign that the Dems are not going to back down from and allow these purely political gestures to tie up the legislative agenda. I hope the trend continues. Even though Bolton is not the hot topic right now, to back off and let his nomination sail through would be perceived at best as caving to public opinion. "Waffling" if you will. I'm tired of the old Democratic argument that we need to save our ammo for the biggest fights. Bolton is the wrong choice for this position now, just as he was at the time of his recess appointment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #12
23. Hi RBS!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
16. That was my suspicion
The fact that they announced the vote was tabled, rather than just tabling it and beating Chafee up in private, seemed to say, well, he wasn't going to make it through the senate anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
17. I originally read the words in that headline in the wrong order!
Damn. Still good that his confirmation is dead, but I had higher hopes than that for a moment...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. I thought about it too, if you take out the word
confirmation, well it would change the whole story now wouldn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
20. Poor little Yosemite Sam won't be able to talk at the UN!
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savemefromdumbya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
22. I thought the post said John Bolton is DEAD!
oops
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rainbowreflect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
24. He is in my city today. Now I really wish I could go & protest!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #24
40. Throw a rotten tomato for me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
31. So what slug will * drag out from under which rock that can be
worse that that snake in the grass. Believe me, every time you think they've scraped the bottom they manage to go lower still.

Also, does this mean that Bolton needs to "cease and desist" doing wreaking havoc and sowing seeds of destruction until another nomination can be made? I would hope that we can give the world a respite and just time to breathe and reevaluate before launching into another round of the BS that passes for foreign policy these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meldroc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. Yay!!!
I can't believe it took this long to get rid of that prick.

Of course, King George will replace him with an even worse prick, but I'll take whatever victories we can get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
negativenihil Donating Member (772 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
32. WOO HOO!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
39. I am responsible! I imagined him gone! Yep. You have me to
thank! LOL Law of Attraction! It works! Try it sometime!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
42. Good, he is a worthless bastard anyway...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
44. Dead dead or just pretend dead until Chafee gets nominated?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC