Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Path to 9/11 Writer Admits Controversial Scene Was "Improvised"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
madmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 04:08 PM
Original message
Path to 9/11 Writer Admits Controversial Scene Was "Improvised"
Edited on Fri Sep-08-06 04:15 PM by madmusic
Path to 9/11 Writer Admits Controversial Scene Was "Improvised"

ABC is marketing its docudrama, The Path to 9/11, as "based on the 9/11 Commission Report." But yesterday, writer Cyrus Nowrasteh admitted that the film's most controversial scene was based on nothing at all. Nowrasteh told a radio station that the scene was "improvised."

EDIT: http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/07/accidents-occur/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
killermedic Donating Member (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's his movie
let him be as irresponsible as he wants with what he says. Then boycott ABC, but don't push for censorship of any type of free speech! That is going to be a whole new brick for the right to build it's bull flag burning laws.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Censorship is what this movie is doing... It is censoring
the truth and trying to change history... Get your facts right...

PS...... Fuck the right, they will do what they do anyway....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. "his" movie -- "ownership" speech
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Good point.
I don't want to censor it any more than the Freepers wanted to censor F 9/11 or "The Reagans." The difference here is the claim it was based on the Commission Report when in fact some scene make that flat out false.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killermedic Donating Member (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Madmusic
I really appreciate your respectful reply. I honestly feel like the truth has been thrown out the window by both sides and all we are doing is allowing precedents to be set by those who would control more of what we can to say about whomever we want to say it. I like the thinking that goes on when we can maintain calm and dignity and not start cursing and carrying on about how wrong someone is for making a movie. speaking of the freepers, they did this same crap when MM released F9/11. I like to think that we are head and shoulders above those guys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-08-06 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. So, we're to believe
that a set was built, technicians worked for hours on lighting, props were placed just so and blocking tape was carefully laid out based on the distance an actor needs to be from camera in order to hit their light (and therefor be seen), a script was worked and reworked by "committee" (a group of producers/wanna-be writers around a table) before going in front of camera and yet, somehow, this "important scene" was left to the magic of improvisation? Damn. I wish people would let me improvise scenes in MY movies like that! :eyes:

At least we know the dirty dogs in charge of this big, lumbering lie are running scared and reaching for (implausible) excuses to cover their sorry arses. LOL

Oh, and the numbers for Disney and ABC have been rock solid busy for hours. Way to go, guys!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC