Political Analysts Discuss Military Tribunals, Sept. 11 Anniversary
:patriot:
Analysts David Brooks and Tom Oliphant discuss President Bush's proposal for military tribunals for terror suspects, how Republicans and Democrats are using terrorism as a political tool and their views on the world since the Sept. 11 attacks.
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/politics/july-dec06/bo_09-08.htmlTOM OLIPHANT: Republican -- think of Republicans as very disciplined fanatics. And then think of Democrats as totally undisciplined neurotics, and you have the setting in which all this happened on Wednesday. People are thinking, oh, my God, he's done this and the Democrats will do that. In truth, the factual situation obliterated this -- this initial thought. But that's the basic difference. The Democrats are looking over their shoulder, expecting to lose at the last minute again. Republicans have this discipline about them that causes them sometimes to march in lockstep off a cliff.
DAVID BROOKS: Well, to some extent, I agree. Whenever -- whenever I interview people in Republican administrations, I always think they're -- they're bland, but normal. And, in Democratic administrations, they're neurotic, but interesting. But -- but I would say, now, after all that's happened, Republicans are bland, but neurotic, which is the worst combination of all possible things. And I would say that the serious point behind that is that the party is no longer a lockstep party in general. It is a party with distractions.
!
"But -- but I would say, now, after all that's happened, Republicans are bland, but neurotic, which is the worst combination of all possible things."
:rofl: :rofl: