Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Agent Who Got '96 Bin-Laden File Says We're Not Much If We Don't Get Him

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 09:58 AM
Original message
Agent Who Got '96 Bin-Laden File Says We're Not Much If We Don't Get Him
Sep. 9, 2006. 07:55 AM

Pulling bin Laden from the shadows
In 1996, FBI agent Daniel Coleman opened a file on the `Saudi prince' and would later identify his terrorist group

by, Rosie Dimanno


"We're not much of a superpower if we let someone like that blow up the biggest buildings in our biggest city and get away with it.''

In the beginning, before 9/11, before the "war on terror," before the global pandemic of diabolical jihad and the international posse of counter-terrorism toughs that it spawned, there was just one rather dishevelled middle-aged man sitting at a cubicle inside a nondescript government building in Virginia.

That man was Daniel Coleman, an agent from the New York office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and in March of 1996 he opened a file on a shadowy individual — regarded then as little more than a nuisance, hardly an urgent threat to American security — Osama bin Laden.

"I thought of him as a money broker,'' Coleman told the Star in an interview last week. "I didn't know he had a group.''

In time, it would be Coleman who first identified an organization called Al Qaeda, although neither he nor the emerging cadre of bin Laden zealots in law enforcement and intelligence circles could convince their masters — and the top echelon in government, through two administrations — about the looming danger it represented, not only halfway around the world but on American soil.


more (excellent account) . . . http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1157753409895&call_pageid=968332188492&col=968793972154&t=TS_Home
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. Exactly--and now he is safe with our ally Pakistan
is Bush incompetent? Or is Osama his favored tool?

a moron could catch Osama. Bush is stupider than a moron, apparently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. did you catch the narrative? It gives a sidecar view of the history
of events. Riveting. The indifference of the superiors really comes through. The account of John O'Neill, ex-chief of the FBI's counterterrorism section, his former boss. Very revealing article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. We could "get" OBL if we wanted to...
IF we wanted to...

This tells me different
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. it's not hard to understand why many take that view
It's incomprehensible why so many apparent opportunities to capture bin-Laden were squandered or bungled. The incompetence is so stunning that we stretch for other explanations. Leadership should have taken care of that. The 'will' to get him is a very important element in all of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
5. neither he nor the emerging cadre of bin Laden zealots in law enforcement
and intelligence circles could convince their masters — and the top echelon in government, through two administrations — about the looming danger it represented . . ."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC