Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chicago Sun Times: Zero Stars

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Tuesday_Morning Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 11:42 AM
Original message
Chicago Sun Times: Zero Stars
Some choice words from television critic Doug Elfman:

I once sat in a car forever waiting for my mom to come out of a grocery store. I thought that was the definition of "interminable." I had no idea "The Path to 9/11" was in my future.


<snip>

Controversy could boost viewership, except "Path" is the dullest, worst-shot TV movie since ABC's disastrous "Ten Commandments" remake. It substitutes shaky handheld cameras and dumb dialogue for craftsmanship. It could not be more amateurish or poorly constructed unless someone had forgotten to light the sets.

An appalling secondary concern is the tone makes almost every pre-9/11 American look like a fool.


<snip>

Excuse us all, writer Cyrus Nowrasteh and director David L. Cunningham, for not acting like Hitler Youth in the glory days before ordinary Americans knew commercial planes could be turned into missiles.


more....http://www.suntimes.com/output/entertainment/cst-ftr-elf08.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. Ouch!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. "This is the most anticlimactic, tension-free movie in the history of
terrorism."

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Janice325 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. Thank you Doug Elfman!!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. Here are some riveting pictures from the IMDB site....LOL.






Gripping, no...:rofl: MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday_Morning Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. Elfman: "Cheap emotions are on Orange Alert."
I like that too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. Sounds like the jist of it.
Stupid fucking RW propagandist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. k+r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Felinity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. ROFLOL
Ironic isn't it. Earlier today I posted my concerns that ordinary people, who are too busy or too lacking in political savvy to know any better, would have a delusional picture of what really happened.

And now I am somewhat comforted by the fact that these are the same people who won't sit through much of a program that is poorly produced and executed (they're way too spoiled by production values of American Idol or CSI, even if they are not consciously aware of the specific differences).

Grab your remote-FOOTBALL season is ON!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. TV Guide gave it RAVE Reviews
I wish I could find it online. I happened to find it in their magazine at the Dr.'s office yesterday. They even had the "based on the 9/11 commission report" in there!! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. here ya go
http://www.tvguide.com/TV/Roush/Review/default.htm?cmsRedir=true&rmDate=08302006&cmsGuid={0AB4ABF3-DA31-4C1C-8619-4CC3FE7A6484}&cmsSrch=true

and his response after getting called on it by a reader:

http://www.tvguide.com/TV/Roush/AskMatt/default.htm?cmsRedir=true&rmDate=09082006&cmsGuid={5B686D31-3822-4F24-B87F-E46B306101A0}&cmsSrch=true


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. What a fuckwad!
:puke:

<snip>

I always expect that projects like this will compress actual events and characters, with the ensuing danger of distorting the facts (which is apparently most glaring in a scene involving Sandy Berger calling off a strike against Osama bin Laden). I still believe it was a gutsy call for a network to devote the resources to such an ambitious and epic project. Given the kind of crud the networks call "movies" nowadays (when they even bother to make them), I found this a laudable attempt, even if flawed, at doing something serious and meaningful, especially in light of the ferocity of the current political landscape, where everything's a minefield. Given the firestorm ABC is getting over this, I imagine it will be a long time before another network tries anything of this nature, and that seems to me a shame.

The criticisms by those who have yet to see the movie are not surprising, and I imagine given their own preconceived biases (I tried to put mine aside, and am as amused as I am horrified to open e-mails accusing me of being a right-wing tool), their opinions probably won't be swayed by actually watching the movie. If I somehow had been psychic enough to know the controversy the film would stir up before its release, I would have tried to reflect that in my review. But I couldn't, so I didn't.



thank you for the link!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. TTT n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cobalt-60 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
11. sweet
You know I hadn't considered that it would be so poorly done that it was unbearable to view.
hehe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
13. That's exactly what I said right here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC