Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

embrace of all things feminine

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Hope springs eternal Donating Member (213 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 02:55 PM
Original message
embrace of all things feminine
after reading the forums, I came to a conclusion...

The age of male rulership sucks.

Fellow DUers, do you think we will ever see an age of girls ruling the world? Should humanity look towards a more womanly way of looking and doing things?


Feminist DUers: do you embrace your femininty?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HarukaTheTrophyWife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. ...
:spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I was just going to answer "No" but I think you're reaction is more...
appropriate. Maybe we should just listen to what the flower people say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HarukaTheTrophyWife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Damn hippies...
Check your PM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. We need to return to the golden age of scowling and constipation!
Nixon! Now more than ever! ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. Unforgivable sexism.
You should be embarrassed.

BTW, I embrace femininity whenever I get a chance ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jcrowley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. You'll appreciate this
War is not a Choice for Women

"For the most part, men have a choice whether to participate in war or not, and they usually have arms at their disposal with which to defend themselves or strike back.

A woman in her home with her children didn't invite the war in on them. She has no safe place to take them when bombs fall on the house and no man - since he is probably elsewhere fighting - to protect her when armed men drag her into the street to be raped and tortured. Their food stolen by invaders, destroyed by bombs or spoiled from lack of refrigeration, any woman left alive gets to watch her children who are not murdered outright starve as they all languish without medical treatment or proper shelter.

War never takes place in wealthy countries.

Many victims of war had little to begin with, and nothing remains after. Aid is often not able to find its way to them, and many are unable to flee even if they knew an attack was immanent.

The idea that people held so powerless by deliberate design of patriarchal religions and power structures suffer the brunt of the misery for actions they had no power to influence is the greatest shame of the human race.

If men choose to fight, let them do it away from civilized people and suffer the consequences, having chosen to be in that time and place. Any man or government that attacks a civilian population is a coward and a criminal of the worst kind, no matter how pure they believe their cause to be.

http://the-goddess.org/blog/

I'm not sure we need rulers of any gender.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'd like to see a balance, personally. What do DUers think about
if the Pres nominee is female, she must choose a male Vice P. and vice versa?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. I've always thought that there should be 50% representation in
all branches of government and that it should be by law. Women are not fairly represented today in this country according to their numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. Condoleezza Rice/Karen Hughes 2008!
The time is right! :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
20. Not fair representation.
Edited on Sat Sep-09-06 03:35 PM by Cleita
How about Jeb and Condisleazy? It could happen. In this case we need a hot shot ticket of our own, maybe John Edwards and Barbara Boxer. We know Barbara Boxer can turn Condileeza into a blithering idiot in a debate. It could be fun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genie_weenie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
7. Men are the way they are because of Women.
Simple genetics.

That being said I think the current age is more conducive to the stereotypical approach women apply to problems.

And Men will eventually be relagated to menial labor or high level math, science and engineering...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewenotdemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. I'm there already
relegated to menial science.

Women DO need to rule the world. That's been obvious to me for some time.

Some of the horrible examples we've seen (Thatcher, Clinton) should be anachronisms in a future world ruled by real women that aren't immitating the male ape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
8. Are you a young person?
No insult intended. I'm asking due to the reference to "girls ruling the world."

In my experience the use of girl rather than woman usually means the person speaking is one of two things, and in this case I think it's a youth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
9. I'm a feminist, but I don't give a flying fuck about my femininity.
I love being a mother, and I'm very attracted to men, and once in a while I enjoy dressing up.

But no, I do not embrace my femininity. I embrace my humanity.

It's not the gender that has made so many of history's rulers suck, IMHO, but the personality type. Margaret Thatcher was not exactly warm, fuzzy, and motherly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. No kidding
I read that post and had visions of embracing things like spike heeled shoes and a pound and a half of makeup applied on a Botoxed face and dressing in lace and ruffles.

No thanks.

I embrace my humanity, too. I'll leave the frou frou to the women and drag queens who enjoy it.

And no, I don't want the type of women the rich will allow to rule in office any more than I want the men they've been selecting for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. I read the post and thought it came from
a teenage male having those very same visions. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. I think you're probably right about that
or a very young woman raised in the bosom of a southern church. They still do things like that in a lot of the south.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HarukaTheTrophyWife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Well...
this poster has said in the past that blurring gender lines "messes" people up. So yes, by embracing my feminity, I can only guess that it means I should be embracing the things you just mentioned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
10. I think it is a great idea to let the women rule, as long as the women
we choose are not of the "men in a dress" variety.

Beside what do we really need men for anyway? A few thousand would be sufficient to keep the species going and think how pleasant all the other aspects of life would be without all the constant "my dick is bigger than yours" bullshit that dominates every aspect of life now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
14. And my inner crone.
I'm the best goldarned feminist crone you'll ever meet. Working on my little feminist princesses and my daughter, the empress goddess. BTW, my 3 yr old granddaughter always replies to the question, "Aren't you pretty?" with "Yes, and I'm smart too." Came up with that one all by her little self. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
21. For what it's worth, the New Age crowd says we
are entering the Age of Aquarius which should bring women back into running things after about five thousand years of patriarchism in the Age of Pisces.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC