Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CBS News: John Rockefeller Says America Would Have Been Safer WITH SADDAM

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
The Cleaner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 05:35 PM
Original message
CBS News: John Rockefeller Says America Would Have Been Safer WITH SADDAM
Edited on Sat Sep-09-06 05:38 PM by The Cleaner
still in power!

CBS Evening News: Bush admin pulled the wool over the public's eyes...

ROCKEFELLER: Absolutely cynical deliberate manipulation to shape public opinion...The U.S. would be better of today WITH SADDAM HUSSEIN STILL IN POWER...He wasn't going attack us, he was isolated.

:bounce:

FYI: Amazing. CBS News is completely FOX-like on the weekdays with Kiss-Ass Katie, but seems to be okay during the weekend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluedeminredstate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why does he hate America?
Appeaser! Terra-lover! Islamofascist!
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. totally agree
We destabilized the country/region, brought terrorism to Iraq that didn't exist before and have angered the entire world.
Not a great day for America
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. He's got some balls to speak an uncomfortable truth
like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. When it "takes balls" for a fabulously rich man
Edited on Sat Sep-09-06 06:00 PM by Benhurst
serving in the U.S. Senate and bearing the name Rockefeller to speak the truth, it shows how low this nation has sunk under the Bush Crime Family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. this rich man has served the very poor state of West Virginia very well
as governor and later as US Senator

Jay has been speaking the truth for years
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. My point still stands and has nothing to do with Rockefeller's record.
Edited on Sat Sep-09-06 07:02 PM by Benhurst
If it is considered "ballsy" for a fabulously rich man bearing the name Rockefeller and serving in the U.S. Senate to tell the truth, this nation has sunk to a new low.

Any U.S. citizen should feel free to speak out, to say nothing of a rich U.S. Senator, whose duty as a senator is to speak out and to do so truthfully.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. he's not fabulously rich
he chose to enter public service when he could have been sitting on his ass drawing from his trust fund

he may be a Rockefeller but he doesn't act like one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cspanlovr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. The more obvious it becomes to a lot of people, the more they dig
their heels in. You know, catapult the propaganda. This 9/11 thing is going to seem mild by Nov. Its depressing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. Who "hosted" the show?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CarlVK Donating Member (632 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. John Rockefeller is absolutely right
As anyone who's even been awake for the last 6 years can see. I can't believe I've reached the day in my country when speaking the obvious truth is such a remarkable achievement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phredicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. Hell, I'm starting to wonder if the Iraqi people would have been safer
with Saddam. Yes, it was as bad a totalitarian state as there was this side of North Korea. But what's happened is that the killing, totrturing, and raping apparati have been decentralized into several competing outfits: It's even harder not to run afoul of one or another of them than it was before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
9. he will get slammed for this comment--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeveneightyWhoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Good he can handle it. And..
..it leads to debate on the issue.

Has Bush really improved the situation in Iraq?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
13. That's the sad truth
And considering everthing Saddam was, it is quite a mouthful.

Do the freepers still want to deny that G. W. Bush is the worst president ever? How much of a fuck up does somebody have to be to fuck up the ouster of a monster like Saddam?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
14. Rockefeller is on the Senate Intelligence Committee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-09-06 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
15. Dec. '05, Howard Dean was right, as usual. Lieberman wrong, as usual.
Monday, January 05, 2004

Democratic Presidential Debate: Lieberman, Kerry slam Dean



In the Democratic debate yesterday, Sen. Joe Lieberman slammed Howard Dean for saying that the capture of Saddam Hussein had made America no safer: "I don't know how anybody could say that we're not safer with a homicidal maniac, a brutal dictator, an enemy of the United States, a supporter of terrorism, a murderer of hundreds of thousands of his own people ... in prison instead of in power."


http://www.juancole.com/2004/01/democratic-presidential-debate.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CarlVK Donating Member (632 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Amen!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danascot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
18. There were times over the past few years
when I would not have been surprised if the US had begged Saddam to come back and get things under control. Considering where we are today, it might not have been a bad idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
exlrrp Donating Member (598 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
19. Ummmm..its JAY Rockefeller nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC