"On tape Clinton admits passing up Bin Laden capture" RW headline boasts.

[gully]

That is one of the headlines on FR today. They use a Newsmax audio clip to "verify" this false claim.

This LIE has been repeated again and again as Republicans believe terrorists in Sudan over our former "Commander in Chief." However, at the time in question, OBL had committed NO crime against the USA.

Media Matters has a good piece on this here:

http://mediamatters.org/items/200406220008

No one involved in the 1996 negotiations apart from former officials of Sudan -- a country that the U.S. State Department has designated as a state sponsor of terrorism every year since 1993 -- has verified the claim that Sudan offered bin Laden to the United States. In light of this lack of evidence, the 9-11 Commission "Staff Statement No. 5," issued in March, rejected the Sudanese claim:

Former Sudanese officials claim that Sudan offered to expel Bin Ladin to the United States. Clinton administration officials deny ever receiving such an offer. We have not found any reliable evidence to support the Sudanese claim.

Sudan did offer to expel Bin Ladin to Saudi Arabia and asked the Saudis to pardon him. U.S. officials became aware of these secret discussions, certainly by March 1996. The evidence suggests that the Saudi government wanted Bin Ladin expelled from Sudan, but would not agree to pardon him. The Saudis did not want Bin Ladin back in their country at all.

Adding this to the information bank.

[gully]

1. kick

[gully]

2. kick

[MelissaB]

5. Here's one for ya.

:kick:

[gully]

6. Thanks.

:hi:

[EFerrari]

3. In a related report, Mr. Clinton admitted to knowing the recipe for

Secret Sauce.

lol

[gully]

4. Ah, he is worthy of interrogation.

;)