Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So, how did Path to 9-11 treat the Bush administration tonite?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 09:23 PM
Original message
So, how did Path to 9-11 treat the Bush administration tonite?
I didn't watch. Did they treat the Bush administration with kid gloves, or was it as hard on Bush as it was on Clinton?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kurth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. No "My Pet Goat". No mention of Bush's whereabouts
President DECISIVELY ORDERED Vice-President over the phone to shoot down invaders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The worst thing I saw
Remember hearing about the August 6, 2001 presidential daily brief that warned Bush that Bin Laden was going to attack the United States? Bush ignored that memo.

The way the movie showed it, Rice read the brief to a room full of everybody involved in counter-terrorism and said that Bush wanted an all out response. The "The president doesn't want to just roll back Al Qaida, he wants to eliminate it" Rice approximately said. Rice portrayed a sense of urgency.

This scene upset me more than any becaues before the film aired the filmmakers promised that they would go hard on Bush two and promised a scene about the presidential brief. I assume they had ones because others said they saw it. If that's true, then apparently, while Democrats were not able to get lies taken out, Bush was able to get the truth taken out. GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Again, Contact ABC and then boycott them
Edited on Mon Sep-11-06 09:45 PM by Erika
It is evident they are on the side of the corporatists and could care less about their viewers.

Don't click on ABC whether its TV, radio, or the net. Just leave them alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. the last 10 minuetes showed the WH stunned, and in total chaos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Does this mean the plane in PA was shot down?
Hmmm....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. All I Saw Was The Last 30 Seconds Accidentally. They Were Probably The
Edited on Mon Sep-11-06 09:43 PM by OPERATIONMINDCRIME
only good part.

It was text commentary about the 9-11 commission report having 41 things to improve, but when graded out of those 41 things 5 were F's, 12 were D's and only one A. It then gave an example of an F, a D and an A. I know the F was somethin like Airport security, forget what the D was, and the A was disrupting financing of terrorists. It ended by supplying a quote from the report along the lines of "we are convinced they will attack us again. If they do, and these changes aren't implemented, what will our excuses be?". Then it hovered there on that point for a little bit.

It was the only 30 seconds I saw of the two nights. As bad as the mockumentary was, I was at least pleased it ended on a "the current administration is currently failing completely" type of note.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lectrobyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. I thought they mangled the swatting at flies quote. Also basically
laid the blame on the CIA for not having Hellfire missiles ready.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bainz Donating Member (278 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
8. A.W.O.L.?
Showed that the Oval Office, as well as the President's desk, was empty...then someone closed the door. Made the admin look asleep at the wheel.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC