|
I've been thinking about posting some thoughts I've had about the media for a while. Just the other night I was at Denny's getting some food and the most amazing and heartbreaking thing happened. Behind me was a family also eating their dinner, but they had brought a portable TV with them. To a restaurant. I think they were watching some sort of game show, just by the music. Is this what we've become as a nation, a group of folks (TM) who can't unplug the IV long enough to eat dinner with our families? Will we just wither and die if we aren't connected to "culture?"
It's easy for me to say. About 5 years ago I stopped watching TV but for 1 or 2 shows a week. It wasn't intentional. It was just that nothing appealed to me, not sitcoms, not movies, and news just didn't do it either. I read books.
It seems to me that media, specifically TV, caters to the lowest common denominator. Worse than that, it's purpose is literally to turn us all into consumers and TV pursues that goal relentlessly. So TV has become more than just entertainment, more than something people do a occasionally, or a little each day. It has become the broadband of American culture, the thing that sustains us. It keeps us connected to a very specific version of the world and molds us to it.
For anyone who regularly read shashdot, they have undoubtedly seen the many threads dedicated to fighting the RIAA, their control of music, and their crusade against people who trade music over the net. While I agree the RIAA has way overstepped the rational, I can't help but wonder what would happen if people simply stopped buying CDs, stopped trading mp3 either illegally or legally, and stopped sending the RIAA money. Why can the industry afford all these lawsuits?
The same can be applied to television. How many times have there been threads about the latest thing to come from Fox news? So when people talk about boycotting ABC, it just doesn't seem likely. How long can the IV be unplugged? But it would be really great if it happened! If everybody could get the news from the 'net and Keith, it would make a difference. Every time people debate "what Rush said," it gets his idea out and no matter how absolutely fucking insane it is, it becomes part of the collective mind of the nation, given credibility simply by being allowed to exist. By arguing about the path to 9-11 in any way other than to call it politically-desperate fiction, keeps the ideas presented there alive.
On the other hand, constantly talking about impeachment keeps that idea alive as well. Talking about the very real concerns about voting fraud and 9-11 "conspiracies" keeps those ideas alive. Even if their ridiculed at first. Argue on your own terms, not those constantly spewed out by the MSM.
This sounds really preachy and I'm really sorry for that - it isn't intentional.
-mwalker
|