A Tough Debate for Burns

[133724]

A detailed account of a debate in the Missoulian said Burns told the audience he’s not the candidate who is “a lawbreaker.”
At that, the newspaper reported, “Members of the audience took offense and shouted ‘psycho’ and booed as Burns claimed that Democratic Senate candidate Jon Tester has an illegal slush fund, has taken ‘unreported’ trips to Taiwan, and made illegal phone calls to raise campaign funds.”

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2006/09/11/a-tough-debate-for-burns/

I feeeeel soooo sorry...........

[babylonsister]

1. Conrad? HaAAAAAA! Is he even viable? If so, what have I missed? nt